Toggle menu
Toggle preferences menu
Toggle personal menu
Not logged in
Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits.

Natural Resists: Difference between revisions

From EVE University Wiki
Saikal (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Saikal (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 1,231: Line 1,231:


The rate at which each faction covers its defenses versus their enemies damage type changes with each class. It is highest with the Type 1 ships and lowest with the Type 6 Ships.
The rate at which each faction covers its defenses versus their enemies damage type changes with each class. It is highest with the Type 1 ships and lowest with the Type 6 Ships.
Common tendancies
*Minmatar
**In general advanced Minmatar ships favor a kiting approach and view their tank as just a hit point buffer so more often than not the holes are not patched. If they are though it is usually done by adding a kinetic and explosive resistance rig.
*Amarr
**Cruiser-sized and above ships are very likely to patch their biggest resist hole and with a single thermic hardener.
*Gallente
**A lot of ships like Ishkurs and Deimoses will plug the basic explosive hole.
*Caldari
**Because of the sheer size of the EMP hole it is a very good bet that there is at least a resistance rig or two if not an active hardener covering that hole.


<!--  
<!--