More actions
m Another detail |
m Moved point for consistency |
||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
===Advantages vs. a Microwarpdrive === | ===Advantages vs. a Microwarpdrive === | ||
* Considerably less skill and fitting requirements | * Considerably less skill and fitting requirements | ||
* They can still be used in Mission deadspaces that interfere with warp fields (this is not a big issue anymore, as almost all deadspace areas now allow MWDs) | * They can still be used in Mission deadspaces that interfere with warp fields (this is not a big issue anymore, as almost all deadspace areas now allow MWDs) | ||
* They don't have a penalty to Capacitor size | * They don't have a penalty to Capacitor size (and thus also GJ/s), and don't use nearly as much capacitor per cycle (higher afterburner skills can allow cap-stable afterburner fits, which are much harder to achieve with MWDs) | ||
* They don't have a penalty to ship signature size whilst active. | * They don't have a penalty to ship signature size whilst active. | ||