More actions
Kadin Arbosa (talk | contribs) Created page with " 2014-10-06: The New Order have been claiming that E-Uni "vouches" for them, pointing to the section that says: there is some evidence that the New Order honors these "indulge..." |
Kadin Arbosa (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
2014-10-06: | 2014-10-06: | ||
The New Order have been claiming that E-Uni "vouches" for them, pointing to the section that says: there is some evidence that the New Order honors these "indulgences." | The New Order have been claiming that E-Uni "vouches" for them, pointing to the section that says: | ||
I have changed the language used to hopefully make it clearer that E-Uni is not actually vouching for the New Order, and simply reporting that there is '''''some''''' evidence for their indulgences being honored. | there is some evidence that the New Order honors these "indulgences." | ||
I have changed the language used to hopefully make it clearer that E-Uni is not actually vouching for the New Order, and simply reporting that there is '''''some''''' evidence for their indulgences being honored. Perhaps a simple "E-Uni does not vouch or in any way endorse the New Order" declaration would be better. | |||
Revision as of 17:38, 6 October 2014
2014-10-06: The New Order have been claiming that E-Uni "vouches" for them, pointing to the section that says:
there is some evidence that the New Order honors these "indulgences."
I have changed the language used to hopefully make it clearer that E-Uni is not actually vouching for the New Order, and simply reporting that there is some evidence for their indulgences being honored. Perhaps a simple "E-Uni does not vouch or in any way endorse the New Order" declaration would be better.