Difference between revisions of "Talk:Stealth Bombers"

From EVE University Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Fix typo and indent on my comment.)
(Feel free to take up cleanup)
Line 3: Line 3:
 
== Clean up ==
 
== Clean up ==
 
Beyond the cleanup tag, it would seem that this page has inconsistencies with current game mechanics. For example, it is stated "Bombs cannot be launched in low security space". The Uni Wiki page on [[smartbombs]] would disagree. Either this page or the smartbombs article is mistaken. --[[User:Elan Vital|Elan Vital]] ([[User talk:Elan Vital|talk]]) 07:00, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
 
Beyond the cleanup tag, it would seem that this page has inconsistencies with current game mechanics. For example, it is stated "Bombs cannot be launched in low security space". The Uni Wiki page on [[smartbombs]] would disagree. Either this page or the smartbombs article is mistaken. --[[User:Elan Vital|Elan Vital]] ([[User talk:Elan Vital|talk]]) 07:00, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
 +
 
: Had a very quick look and noticed this bit of text "It features a 3L-3M-5H slot layout, composing of three low slots, three mid slots, and five high slots.", it says the same twice. There is not much linking going on, mostly to ships. Also the giant skill plan might benefit of {{T|SkillQueue}} --[[User:Evon R'al|Evon R'al]] ([[User talk:Evon R'al|talk]]) 08:04, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
 
: Had a very quick look and noticed this bit of text "It features a 3L-3M-5H slot layout, composing of three low slots, three mid slots, and five high slots.", it says the same twice. There is not much linking going on, mostly to ships. Also the giant skill plan might benefit of {{T|SkillQueue}} --[[User:Evon R'al|Evon R'al]] ([[User talk:Evon R'al|talk]]) 08:04, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
  
 
: "The Uni Wiki page on [[smartbombs]] would disagree." Smartbombs are not [[bombs]] and the page about smartbombs has a big note on its top about that. It's not the wiki's fault that two different systems are named so similarly.
 
: "The Uni Wiki page on [[smartbombs]] would disagree." Smartbombs are not [[bombs]] and the page about smartbombs has a big note on its top about that. It's not the wiki's fault that two different systems are named so similarly.
 
: The points in the cleanup box are correct. The length of the article isn't really an issue but sort of unfocused, for example there is a good bit of text about each individual bomber, more than on their dedicated pages in fact. [[User:Erwin Madelung|Erwin Madelung]] ([[User talk:Erwin Madelung|talk]]) 09:04, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
 
: The points in the cleanup box are correct. The length of the article isn't really an issue but sort of unfocused, for example there is a good bit of text about each individual bomber, more than on their dedicated pages in fact. [[User:Erwin Madelung|Erwin Madelung]] ([[User talk:Erwin Madelung|talk]]) 09:04, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
 +
 +
: Remember, if you believe the cleanup will takes either more than one editor or days/weeks, feel free to put it up on [[UniWiki:Projects]]. [[User:Arin Mara|Arin Mara]] ([[User talk:Arin Mara|talk]]) 11:54, 20 June 2022 (UTC)

Revision as of 11:54, 20 June 2022

Let's promote fitting and MSE to all bombers... y/n? Bobbyrush (talk) 19:19, 15 July 2014 (UTC)

Clean up

Beyond the cleanup tag, it would seem that this page has inconsistencies with current game mechanics. For example, it is stated "Bombs cannot be launched in low security space". The Uni Wiki page on smartbombs would disagree. Either this page or the smartbombs article is mistaken. --Elan Vital (talk) 07:00, 18 June 2022 (UTC)

Had a very quick look and noticed this bit of text "It features a 3L-3M-5H slot layout, composing of three low slots, three mid slots, and five high slots.", it says the same twice. There is not much linking going on, mostly to ships. Also the giant skill plan might benefit of {{SkillQueue}} --Evon R'al (talk) 08:04, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
"The Uni Wiki page on smartbombs would disagree." Smartbombs are not bombs and the page about smartbombs has a big note on its top about that. It's not the wiki's fault that two different systems are named so similarly.
The points in the cleanup box are correct. The length of the article isn't really an issue but sort of unfocused, for example there is a good bit of text about each individual bomber, more than on their dedicated pages in fact. Erwin Madelung (talk) 09:04, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
Remember, if you believe the cleanup will takes either more than one editor or days/weeks, feel free to put it up on UniWiki:Projects. Arin Mara (talk) 11:54, 20 June 2022 (UTC)