Toggle menu
Toggle preferences menu
Toggle personal menu
Not logged in
Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits.

Ice harvesting: Difference between revisions

From EVE University Wiki
No edit summary
Line 65: Line 65:


===Ice Harvesting Upgrades===
===Ice Harvesting Upgrades===
(I will be using the Retriever as the example)


We can reduce the cycle time even further by using Ice Harvesting Upgrades. These basically work the same as Mining Laser Upgrades, but the bonus reduces cycle time instead of increasing yield. A T1 upgrade gives a 5% bonus with a 10% CPU penalty, and a T2 upgrade gives a 9% bonus with 12.5% penalty.
We can reduce the cycle time even further by using Ice Harvesting Upgrades. These basically work the same as Mining Laser Upgrades, but the bonus reduces cycle time instead of increasing yield. A T1 upgrade gives a 5% bonus with a 10% CPU penalty, and a T2 upgrade gives a 9% bonus with 12.5% penalty.
Obviously our ultimate aim is two fill both of the low power slots with these modules for a combined cycle reduction of 18%.
Obviously our ultimate aim is two fill all of the low power slots with these modules for a combined cycle reduction of 27%.


<!-- todo: check if 9%->18% upgrade stacking is correct, check if mining upgrades skill affects ice upgrade CPU usage -->
<!-- todo: check if 9%->18%->27% upgrade stacking is correct, check if mining upgrades skill affects ice upgrade CPU usage -->
 
Only a single upgrade can be fitted on a retriever, and if you have access to a hauler it is a good idea to use a cargo expander in the spare lowslot, even if you don't have enough space for another ice block. The reason is that the retriever's base cargo space (2000m3) fits 2 blocks exactly, so when your cargo hold fills, one of the harvesters will turn off. If you have a bit of extra space this wont happen and you can continue uninterrupted.


===Rigs===
===Rigs===
Medium Ice Harvester Accelerator I results in a 12% reduction to the duration of ice harvester cycles. Calibration cost: 250
Medium Ice Harvester Accelerator I results in a 12% reduction to the duration of ice harvester cycles. Calibration cost: 250
==Hulk or Mackinaw==
The Hulk and Mackinaw are the best ice mining ships; choosing between them is a matter of preference and situation.


'''Ice Output'''<br>
'''Ice Output'''<br>
This is an easy one to answer: the Mackinaw produces more ice per minute then the hulk can. This is down to the fact that it has a 100% yield bonus so for every cycle you receive 4 pieces of ice instead of three.
due to the changes:
 
Skiff 66% reduction in cycle time + 1% for every level of Exhumer
Mackinaw 33% reduction in cycle time + 1% for every level of Exhumer
Hulk 0% reduction in cycle time but + 4% for every level of Exhumer
'''Cargo Space'''<br>
'''Cargo Space'''<br>
The hulk is capable of holding at least 8 pieces of ice compared to the Mackinaw’s 6, so the hulk can stay out longer before having to return to that station if solo mining.  
the Mackinaw its the elite in cargo hold followed by the skiff leaving the Hulk trailing behind at last place.  


'''Survivability''' <br>
'''Survivability''' <br>
While most ice mining is done in hisec, suicide gankers often see the AFK nature of ice miners as an advantage. In Hulkageddon 3, the systems with most casualties were Nakugard, Oppold and Eygfe: all systems with ice belts. The Hulk has an greatly increased chance of surviving a ganker attack then the Mackinaw does; the Mackinaw has very limited CPU and has to reduce its yield significantly to fit a decent tank.
While most ice mining is done in hisec, suicide gankers often see the AFK nature of ice miners as an advantage.  
 
the skiff take the far lead due to its bonuses in shield and tank abilitys.


'''Price'''<br>
'''Price'''<br>
Most dedicated miners will own a Hulk for high-yield mining, so frequently the Mackinaw is bought as a second ship dedicated to ice mining, and as such significantly increases purchase costs compared to using the Hulk.
Most dedicated miners will own a Hulk for high-yield mining, so frequently the Mackinaw is bought as a second ship dedicated to solo mining due to cargo, as the market for both change depending on the time-demand or availablity the price cant be set as a guide to what ship is the cheapest looking at you local market and comparing the price with your need, ect will have to be taken into account to see what is the best for you


<!--'''The big question – Is Ice mining actually for me?'''
<!--'''The big question – Is Ice mining actually for me?'''


Yet again another question without a correct answer. There are many reasons for and against Ice Mining, but there are some important facts that need to be said. Ice has a limited use compared to asteroids. Minerals from asteroids are used throughout eve, basically everything out there is made out of minerals where as ice products are only used in Player Owned Structures and certain ships with jump drive capability.
Yet again another question without a correct answer. There are many reasons for and against Ice Mining, but there are some important facts that need to be said. Ice has a limited use compared to asteroids. Minerals from asteroids are used throughout eve, basically everything out there is made out of minerals where as ice products are only used in Player Owned Structures and certain ships with jump drive capability.
It is perhaps considered easier to ice mine, as the cycle times are significantly longer then asteroid mining modules, and ice asteroids are so massive, that it would take a large fleet of ships to mine all of the ice, as such it is very difficult for the ice asteroid to run out. Many miners will tell you the frustration at mining an asteroid with hardly next to nothing in it and loosing cycle time because they haven’t got the attention to focus on there scanners. This is perhaps where Ice Mining does come into its own, and many miners have been known to hit the asteroid belt while they are, for example, studying.  
It is perhaps considered easier to ice mine, as the cycle times are significantly longer then asteroid mining modules, and ice asteroids are so massive, that it would take a large fleet of ships to mine all of the ice, as such it is very difficult for the ice asteroid to run out. Many miners will tell you the frustration at mining an asteroid with hardly next to nothing in it and loosing cycle time because they haven’t got the attention to focus on there scanners. This is perhaps where Ice Mining does come into its own, and many miners have been known to hit the "Ice Field" while they are, for example, studying.  
The final big issue is well, that ice is big! Just one block takes up 1000m3 of space. So an unmodified Hulk can only fit 8 pieces, not much really. Many professional ice miners will have a second account to act as a hauler to move the ice and leave the miner in place.-->
The final big issue is well, that ice is big! Just one block takes up 1000m3 of space. So an unmodified Hulk can only fit a low amount, not much really. Many professional ice miners will have a second account to act as a hauler to move the ice and leave the miner in place. or be in a fleet or use the ore hold god called the Mackinaw.


==Perfect Ice Mining Requirements==
==Perfect Ice Mining Requirements==
Line 111: Line 112:
* [[Skills:Industry#Ice Harvesting|Ice Harvesting V]]
* [[Skills:Industry#Ice Harvesting|Ice Harvesting V]]


2 x Ice Mining Upgrades
Ice Mining Upgrades
 
This skill set will result in 2 pieces of Ice per Ice harvester with a cycle time of 4min 20sec


This skill set will result in a reduction of cycle time on your lasers.
[[Category:Guides]]
[[Category:Guides]]
[[Category:Industry]]
[[Category:Industry]]
[[Category:Mining]]
[[Category:Mining]]