Difference between revisions of "Talk:Cheetah"
From EVE University Wiki
Aurora mundi (talk | contribs) (question on the suitability of a fit) |
Aurora mundi (talk | contribs) (→perhaps a bit too harsh criticism: new section) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | + | I suggest we remove the initial fit from this page altogether. Frankly speaking, a dual prop, shield tanked, inertial stabbed covert ops frigate is a terrible idea. | |
| − | + | == perhaps a bit too harsh criticism == | |
| − | + | Nosaert, | |
| + | |||
| + | That initial fit increases a ship's signature radius by a significant factor for negligible benefits. As Praetoris stated in his notes, the cloak is the tank, not a shield extender. | ||
| + | |||
| + | I don't see how that fit is optimal in any way. If you agree, I suggest its removal would be welcome. If you disagree, please reply. | ||
Latest revision as of 03:52, 19 April 2013
I suggest we remove the initial fit from this page altogether. Frankly speaking, a dual prop, shield tanked, inertial stabbed covert ops frigate is a terrible idea.
perhaps a bit too harsh criticism
Nosaert,
That initial fit increases a ship's signature radius by a significant factor for negligible benefits. As Praetoris stated in his notes, the cloak is the tank, not a shield extender.
I don't see how that fit is optimal in any way. If you agree, I suggest its removal would be welcome. If you disagree, please reply.
