Toggle menu
Toggle preferences menu
Toggle personal menu
Not logged in
Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits.

Interceptors: Difference between revisions

From EVE University Wiki
Thabink (talk | contribs)
Overview: warp speed of fleet and combat are now the same.
Thabink (talk | contribs)
Line 93: Line 93:
====Priority considerations====
====Priority considerations====
* Long range point (T2)
* Long range point (T2)
*: The meta 4 points still only have a 20km range, so we ''need'' T2 (which gives 24km pointing range). Don't fit a scram unless you have a slot to spare on your Stiletto.
*: The meta 4 points still only have a 20km range, so we ''need'' T2 (which gives 24km pointing range). Don't fit a scram instead; if you have four mid slots you can add a scram as extra.
* MWD
* MWD
*: For combat interceptors, the Afterburner could be an option, but not so for the fleet inty. We want to orbit at range and keep a point. AB is just too slow for that job. Go for the best meta version of the 1MN MWD (currently the meta 2 "Limited 1MN Microwarpdrive I"), as you will keep it running most of the time and thus the higher cap usage of the T2 module would neutralize its lower overall cap penalty. Also, meta MWD will overheat slightly longer.
*: For combat interceptors, the Afterburner could be an option, but not so for the fleet inty. We want to orbit at range and keep a point. AB is just too slow for that job. Go for the best meta version of the 1MN MWD (currently the meta 2 "Limited 1MN Microwarpdrive I"), as you will keep it running most of the time and thus the higher cap usage of the T2 module would neutralize its lower overall cap penalty. Also, meta MWD will overheat slightly longer.