Difference between revisions of "Talk:Cheetah"

From EVE University Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(question on the suitability of a fit)
 
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
Praetoris Domitian,
+
I suggest we remove the initial fit from this page altogether.  Frankly speaking, a dual prop, shield tanked, inertial stabbed covert ops frigate is a terrible idea.
  
Are you sure the benefits of a dual-prop, shield tanked, and inertial stabbed cheetah outweigh the drawbacks?
+
== perhaps a bit too harsh criticism ==
  
Aurora
+
Nosaert,
 +
 
 +
That initial fit increases a ship's signature radius by a significant factor for negligible benefits.  As Praetoris stated in his notes, the cloak is the tank, not a shield extender.
 +
 
 +
I don't see how that fit is optimal in any way.  If you agree, I suggest its removal would be welcome.  If you disagree, please reply.

Latest revision as of 03:52, 19 April 2013

I suggest we remove the initial fit from this page altogether. Frankly speaking, a dual prop, shield tanked, inertial stabbed covert ops frigate is a terrible idea.

perhaps a bit too harsh criticism

Nosaert,

That initial fit increases a ship's signature radius by a significant factor for negligible benefits. As Praetoris stated in his notes, the cloak is the tank, not a shield extender.

I don't see how that fit is optimal in any way. If you agree, I suggest its removal would be welcome. If you disagree, please reply.