More actions
→Fixing up the Categories: Started category style discussion |
m →Desired Layout: Added sig. |
||
| Line 64: | Line 64: | ||
Either way is understandable to both novice wiki users as well as old hats, however, I tend to personally like the Open-Directory style as you only need to go to a major category and browse the entries/subcategories to get a feel for what's contained in a name-space. However if you want to refine what you're looking at, this too is available. | Either way is understandable to both novice wiki users as well as old hats, however, I tend to personally like the Open-Directory style as you only need to go to a major category and browse the entries/subcategories to get a feel for what's contained in a name-space. However if you want to refine what you're looking at, this too is available. | ||
The bottom line is that the Open-Directory structure is the most flexible and gives you the best of both organizational worlds in my opinion. | The bottom line is that the Open-Directory structure is the most flexible and gives you the best of both organizational worlds in my opinion. -[[User:Haeric|Haeric]] 04:43, 10 August 2010 (UTC) | ||
== Places Category and Content == | == Places Category and Content == | ||
Many of the places categories are marked for deletion and their associated content is either marked depreciated or is marked for deletion as well. Are these pages going to be maintained, especially in light of the fact that the Evelopedia contains much of the same information? - [[User:Haeric|Haeric]] 02:32, 10 August 2010 (UTC) | Many of the places categories are marked for deletion and their associated content is either marked depreciated or is marked for deletion as well. Are these pages going to be maintained, especially in light of the fact that the Evelopedia contains much of the same information? - [[User:Haeric|Haeric]] 02:32, 10 August 2010 (UTC) | ||