More actions
Esca Sinak (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Esca Sinak (talk | contribs) m →FAQ: Some formatting edits. |
||
| Line 295: | Line 295: | ||
How do you define a | How do you define a “reasonable PvP fitting”? | ||
* Not an obvious PvE fit. | * Not an obvious PvE fit. | ||
| Line 304: | Line 304: | ||
What constitutes | What constitutes “reasonable effort”? | ||
* You don’t have to win, but you have to give it your best shot. | * You don’t have to win, but you have to give it your best shot. | ||
* Specifically, intentional chain suicides, comedy fleets, drunk roams, AFK losses and deliberate acts of monumental stupidity may be grounds to reject a reimbursement request. Each case is evaluated separately by the officer processing the request, so please provide sufficiently detailed comments on all losses. | * Specifically, intentional chain suicides, comedy fleets, drunk roams, AFK losses and deliberate acts of monumental stupidity may be grounds to reject a reimbursement request. Each case is evaluated separately by the officer processing the request, so please provide sufficiently detailed comments on all losses. | ||
* Please note this in no way reflects management views of the above; it simply means the University will not pay for them. | * Please note this in no way reflects management's views of the above; it simply means the University will not pay for them. | ||