Difference between revisions of "Talk:Electronic warfare"
John Haldane (talk | contribs) (note on SDA changes.) |
|||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
I think Apocrypha changed the percentages on SDAs; I'm sure it added a range bonus. I'm going to look them up and update the page; this note is to remind me to do it. --Haldane | I think Apocrypha changed the percentages on SDAs; I'm sure it added a range bonus. I'm going to look them up and update the page; this note is to remind me to do it. --Haldane | ||
| + | |||
| + | Updated the ECM falloff and optimal ranges along with SDAs since I happened by. It's 5%/10% now instead of the 10%/20% in the past, and it does boost range. --[[User:Drillock|Drillock]] | ||
Revision as of 04:51, 1 September 2009
Before I mess up the work of others I would like to discuss it here. For entirely new players it's often difficult to decide in what situations (PVE, PVP) to chose what fitting. I know fitting would be a different page. But I'd suggest, that in the be beginning of such a page there should be an introduction of when it's indicated to use ewar stuff. Again if someone reads carefully he/she will notice that the title is "EWar" and one isn't at War in PVE. But still it might be a help for noob's to give such an introduction. What do you think? --Schemha 12:20, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
Ever tried EW against sleepers in wormholes? It's quite effective.
aqua
I think Apocrypha changed the percentages on SDAs; I'm sure it added a range bonus. I'm going to look them up and update the page; this note is to remind me to do it. --Haldane
Updated the ECM falloff and optimal ranges along with SDAs since I happened by. It's 5%/10% now instead of the 10%/20% in the past, and it does boost range. --Drillock
