Difference between revisions of "Talk:Guardian/Fittings"
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
I've added DC II variants of the fits to the 1600mm plate versions. There is no significant advantage to use a DC II for the 800 mm plates as it unbalances the resists without a significant buffer increase. [[User:Christopher nolm|Christopher nolm]] ([[User talk:Christopher nolm|talk]]) 16:04, 15 January 2017 (CST) | I've added DC II variants of the fits to the 1600mm plate versions. There is no significant advantage to use a DC II for the 800 mm plates as it unbalances the resists without a significant buffer increase. [[User:Christopher nolm|Christopher nolm]] ([[User talk:Christopher nolm|talk]]) 16:04, 15 January 2017 (CST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | I've now removed the DC II variants as the extra buffer is marginal. I've also added a scram chain to the fits. --07:55, 5 March 2017 (CST)[[User:Christopher nolm|Christopher Nolm]] ([[User talk:Christopher nolm|talk]]) | ||
Revision as of 13:55, 5 March 2017
The standard active and passive fits aren't very good. The RiggSet2 Active is no longer possible to fit so I will edit. I will add my own fits with an explanation and then if there are no edits or objections, I will make my fits the standard Active/Passive fits. Christopher nolm (talk) 07:31, 15 January 2017 (CST)
I've added the new fitting. I will wait to see if there are amendments or discussions. If no discussions after an appropriate amount of time then I will delete the old fits and make the new fits the 'standard' Christopher nolm (talk) 13:39, 15 January 2017 (CST)
I've added DC II variants of the fits to the 1600mm plate versions. There is no significant advantage to use a DC II for the 800 mm plates as it unbalances the resists without a significant buffer increase. Christopher nolm (talk) 16:04, 15 January 2017 (CST)
I've now removed the DC II variants as the extra buffer is marginal. I've also added a scram chain to the fits. --07:55, 5 March 2017 (CST)Christopher Nolm (talk)
