Difference between revisions of "User:Titus tallang/BLAP doctrine sandbox"
m |
m |
||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
Aside from being very newbie-friendly, Talwars are also excellent for raiding fleets generally because of their fairly high alpha, fast warp speed, and mobility. Talwar fleets have often traded well against QRFs after decimating ratters and miners in null pockets, which results in fun fights and great kills.}} | Aside from being very newbie-friendly, Talwars are also excellent for raiding fleets generally because of their fairly high alpha, fast warp speed, and mobility. Talwar fleets have often traded well against QRFs after decimating ratters and miners in null pockets, which results in fun fights and great kills.}} | ||
− | }} | + | |width=90%}} |
{{Template:CollapseBox|What areas of space is this doctrine best suited to?| | {{Template:CollapseBox|What areas of space is this doctrine best suited to?| | ||
{{quote|[[Image:Raido_Kudonen.jpg|36px|link=]] '''Raido Kudonen''' | {{quote|[[Image:Raido_Kudonen.jpg|36px|link=]] '''Raido Kudonen''' | ||
Talwars are best in nullsec, where you can easily warp the fleet at range to targets so that you begin the fight at your preferred engagement range and can just begin volleying targets.}} | Talwars are best in nullsec, where you can easily warp the fleet at range to targets so that you begin the fight at your preferred engagement range and can just begin volleying targets.}} | ||
− | }} | + | |width=90%}} |
{{Template:CollapseBox|How should the fleet be positioned when using this doctrine?| | {{Template:CollapseBox|How should the fleet be positioned when using this doctrine?| | ||
{{quote|[[Image:Raido_Kudonen.jpg|36px|link=]] '''Raido Kudonen''' | {{quote|[[Image:Raido_Kudonen.jpg|36px|link=]] '''Raido Kudonen''' | ||
Talwars should engage at a range of 50-60km. Anchor on the FC (or for a very new FC, the designated fleet anchor) and take countdowns to blap the broadcasted target. Talwars should get to this ideal range (if they don’t start there from a good warp-in) as soon as possible, then maximize transversal or align out depending on the threats on field.}} | Talwars should engage at a range of 50-60km. Anchor on the FC (or for a very new FC, the designated fleet anchor) and take countdowns to blap the broadcasted target. Talwars should get to this ideal range (if they don’t start there from a good warp-in) as soon as possible, then maximize transversal or align out depending on the threats on field.}} | ||
− | width= | + | |width=90%}} |
{{Template:CollapseBox|Are there any fleet comp aspects that are critical to the doctrine?| | {{Template:CollapseBox|Are there any fleet comp aspects that are critical to the doctrine?| | ||
{{quote|[[Image:Raido_Kudonen.jpg|36px|link=]] '''Raido Kudonen''' | {{quote|[[Image:Raido_Kudonen.jpg|36px|link=]] '''Raido Kudonen''' | ||
Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
In any case, you should always have at least one interceptor and one interdictor for every 10 Talwars. If you have 15+ Talwars, it is worthwhile to bring at least one command destroyer (ideally a Bifrost with Skirmish: Rapid Deployment and either Skirmish: Interdiction Maneuvers or Shield: Shield Harmonizing links, depending on if you brought a Hyena/Keres or not). Speaking of the Hyena and Keres, you ought to bring one of each with 15+ Talwars because they respectively insulate your fleet from incoming tackle and can damp out enemy logi if you’re not one-shotting enemy ships.}} | In any case, you should always have at least one interceptor and one interdictor for every 10 Talwars. If you have 15+ Talwars, it is worthwhile to bring at least one command destroyer (ideally a Bifrost with Skirmish: Rapid Deployment and either Skirmish: Interdiction Maneuvers or Shield: Shield Harmonizing links, depending on if you brought a Hyena/Keres or not). Speaking of the Hyena and Keres, you ought to bring one of each with 15+ Talwars because they respectively insulate your fleet from incoming tackle and can damp out enemy logi if you’re not one-shotting enemy ships.}} | ||
− | }} | + | |width=90%}} |
{{Template:CollapseBox|Are there any unusual high priority targets when flying this doctrine?| | {{Template:CollapseBox|Are there any unusual high priority targets when flying this doctrine?| | ||
{{quote|[[Image:Raido_Kudonen.jpg|36px|link=]] '''Raido Kudonen''' | {{quote|[[Image:Raido_Kudonen.jpg|36px|link=]] '''Raido Kudonen''' | ||
Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
The Cerberus is a special case because it very nearly counts as a “weakness” or “run away immediately” ship. This is because the Cerberus outranges Talwars (by about 10km if the Cerb loads Fury Scourge, or by about 30km if the Cerb loads faction Scourge) and kills one Talwar every 4 volleys (5 Talwars per RLML clip). However, the Cerb typically has an explosive resist hole and less than 50k EHP against your Nova missiles, so if a Cerberus pilot is stupid enough to warp into your missile damage envelope and not immediately kite out, you can two-shot him with 20+ Talwars and trade very well on the ISK.}} | The Cerberus is a special case because it very nearly counts as a “weakness” or “run away immediately” ship. This is because the Cerberus outranges Talwars (by about 10km if the Cerb loads Fury Scourge, or by about 30km if the Cerb loads faction Scourge) and kills one Talwar every 4 volleys (5 Talwars per RLML clip). However, the Cerb typically has an explosive resist hole and less than 50k EHP against your Nova missiles, so if a Cerberus pilot is stupid enough to warp into your missile damage envelope and not immediately kite out, you can two-shot him with 20+ Talwars and trade very well on the ISK.}} | ||
− | }} | + | |width=90%}} |
{{Template:CollapseBox|What are weaknesses of this doctrine? What situations is it not suited to?| | {{Template:CollapseBox|What are weaknesses of this doctrine? What situations is it not suited to?| | ||
{{quote|[[Image:Raido_Kudonen.jpg|36px|link=]] '''Raido Kudonen''' | {{quote|[[Image:Raido_Kudonen.jpg|36px|link=]] '''Raido Kudonen''' | ||
Line 40: | Line 40: | ||
Similarly, be extremely careful of engaging enemies who have Huginn/Rapier support, as they can web past your missile range and therefore make it very difficult for you to maneuver. Finally, Talwars are utterly unsuited for “small gang” warfare; if you can’t get your gang of fewer than 10 pilots into something better than kitey, low-DPS destroyers, you should just take frigates or Thrashers and bait inside FW plexes.}} | Similarly, be extremely careful of engaging enemies who have Huginn/Rapier support, as they can web past your missile range and therefore make it very difficult for you to maneuver. Finally, Talwars are utterly unsuited for “small gang” warfare; if you can’t get your gang of fewer than 10 pilots into something better than kitey, low-DPS destroyers, you should just take frigates or Thrashers and bait inside FW plexes.}} | ||
− | }} | + | |width=90%}} |
{{Template:CollapseBox|How does tackle work for this kind of high range doctrine?| | {{Template:CollapseBox|How does tackle work for this kind of high range doctrine?| | ||
{{quote|[[Image:Raido_Kudonen.jpg|36px|link=]] '''Raido Kudonen''' | {{quote|[[Image:Raido_Kudonen.jpg|36px|link=]] '''Raido Kudonen''' | ||
Line 51: | Line 51: | ||
What's absolutely indefensible is suiciding badly-fit T1 ships into an enemy gang in hopes of holding them on grid long enough for the rest of the fleet to accomplish something, especially if the badly-fit T1 ships are also less mobile/warp slower than the rest of the fleet.}} | What's absolutely indefensible is suiciding badly-fit T1 ships into an enemy gang in hopes of holding them on grid long enough for the rest of the fleet to accomplish something, especially if the badly-fit T1 ships are also less mobile/warp slower than the rest of the fleet.}} | ||
− | }} | + | |width=90%}} |
=== Fittings === | === Fittings === | ||
Line 65: | Line 65: | ||
Caracals are currently one of the strongest kiting T1 cruisers. With all Vs they can reach as far out as 65km with rapid lights (a very powerful weapons system). It's much easier for an FC to concentrate on the fight than worrying about weapon tracking or targets getting 'under your guns', as for the most part, you only need worry about range with RLMLs. They also sport a fairly decent tank at ~30k EHP. That coupled with their speed under MWD (up to 1900m/s) makes them fantastic ships at kiting and outranging most other T1 cruisers.}} | Caracals are currently one of the strongest kiting T1 cruisers. With all Vs they can reach as far out as 65km with rapid lights (a very powerful weapons system). It's much easier for an FC to concentrate on the fight than worrying about weapon tracking or targets getting 'under your guns', as for the most part, you only need worry about range with RLMLs. They also sport a fairly decent tank at ~30k EHP. That coupled with their speed under MWD (up to 1900m/s) makes them fantastic ships at kiting and outranging most other T1 cruisers.}} | ||
− | }} | + | |width=90%}} |
{{Template:CollapseBox|What areas of space is this doctrine best suited to?| | {{Template:CollapseBox|What areas of space is this doctrine best suited to?| | ||
{{quote|[[Image:Raido_Kudonen.jpg|36px|link=]] '''Raido Kudonen''' | {{quote|[[Image:Raido_Kudonen.jpg|36px|link=]] '''Raido Kudonen''' | ||
Line 73: | Line 73: | ||
You could technically fly this doctrine in any part of space, so long as your intention is not to brawl with it, of course. This means taking a fight inside a plex with a brawling vexor fleet already setup inside, is a bad idea. You also want to try and avoid being caught in bubbles on gates if you're in null.}} | You could technically fly this doctrine in any part of space, so long as your intention is not to brawl with it, of course. This means taking a fight inside a plex with a brawling vexor fleet already setup inside, is a bad idea. You also want to try and avoid being caught in bubbles on gates if you're in null.}} | ||
− | }} | + | |width=90%}} |
{{Template:CollapseBox|How should the fleet be positioned when using this doctrine?| | {{Template:CollapseBox|How should the fleet be positioned when using this doctrine?| | ||
{{quote|[[Image:White_0rchid.jpg|36px|link=]] '''White 0rchid''' | {{quote|[[Image:White_0rchid.jpg|36px|link=]] '''White 0rchid''' | ||
Line 83: | Line 83: | ||
NB: If hostiles chase you while you're kiting, you can project damage beyond your normal maximum missile range because the hostiles are flying towards your missiles.}} | NB: If hostiles chase you while you're kiting, you can project damage beyond your normal maximum missile range because the hostiles are flying towards your missiles.}} | ||
− | }} | + | |width=90%}} |
{{Template:CollapseBox|Are there any fleet comp aspects that are critical to the doctrine?| | {{Template:CollapseBox|Are there any fleet comp aspects that are critical to the doctrine?| | ||
{{quote|[[Image:Raido_Kudonen.jpg|36px|link=]] '''Raido Kudonen''' | {{quote|[[Image:Raido_Kudonen.jpg|36px|link=]] '''Raido Kudonen''' | ||
Line 95: | Line 95: | ||
As with any fleet, try and keep a good ratio of caracals to logi. 3:1 isn't bad. I would always try and bring along a few intys with you. Don't focus on too many support roles though. You don't really need webbers or painters. You really just need numbers. RLMLs have very good damage with great application so you want to take them by surprise with that.}} | As with any fleet, try and keep a good ratio of caracals to logi. 3:1 isn't bad. I would always try and bring along a few intys with you. Don't focus on too many support roles though. You don't really need webbers or painters. You really just need numbers. RLMLs have very good damage with great application so you want to take them by surprise with that.}} | ||
− | }} | + | |width=90%}} |
{{Template:CollapseBox|Are there any unusual high priority targets when flying this doctrine?| | {{Template:CollapseBox|Are there any unusual high priority targets when flying this doctrine?| | ||
{{quote|[[Image:Raido_Kudonen.jpg|36px|link=]] '''Raido Kudonen''' | {{quote|[[Image:Raido_Kudonen.jpg|36px|link=]] '''Raido Kudonen''' | ||
Line 105: | Line 105: | ||
Not particularly, no more so than other doctrines anyway. You probably want to haze fast tackle asap though. Both those and gallente/minmatar recons will be annoying as they'll shut down your ability to kite.}} | Not particularly, no more so than other doctrines anyway. You probably want to haze fast tackle asap though. Both those and gallente/minmatar recons will be annoying as they'll shut down your ability to kite.}} | ||
− | }} | + | |width=90%}} |
{{Template:CollapseBox|What are weaknesses of this doctrine? What situations is it not suited to?| | {{Template:CollapseBox|What are weaknesses of this doctrine? What situations is it not suited to?| | ||
{{quote|[[Image:White_0rchid.jpg|36px|link=]] '''White 0rchid''' | {{quote|[[Image:White_0rchid.jpg|36px|link=]] '''White 0rchid''' | ||
Line 113: | Line 113: | ||
Caracals' greatest weakness is their relatively low sustained DPS (factoring in reloads). You should avoid engaging targets that can tank through your clip or make you waste too many shots compared to other targets. Therefore, unless you hugely outnumber them, avoid engaging powerful self-rep ships (Deimos, Hyperion, marauders) or gangs with T2 logi. If you have Hyena and Griffin support, you can stay on grid with a carrier and rack up fighter killmails (and clear smaller ships on grid), but you have no realistic chance of actually killing the carrier or any other capital ships.}} | Caracals' greatest weakness is their relatively low sustained DPS (factoring in reloads). You should avoid engaging targets that can tank through your clip or make you waste too many shots compared to other targets. Therefore, unless you hugely outnumber them, avoid engaging powerful self-rep ships (Deimos, Hyperion, marauders) or gangs with T2 logi. If you have Hyena and Griffin support, you can stay on grid with a carrier and rack up fighter killmails (and clear smaller ships on grid), but you have no realistic chance of actually killing the carrier or any other capital ships.}} | ||
− | }} | + | |width=90%}} |
=== Fittings === | === Fittings === | ||
Line 125: | Line 125: | ||
This Vexor doctrine is another variant in a long line of afterburning, armor-tanked cruisers that use their low signature radius and moderate velocity to their advantage in brawling fights. Vexors also punch down very effectively against assault frigate or T3D gangs, since they can carry both a “damage” set (with a couple Ogres or, in alpha versions, a flight of Hammerheads) and an “application” set (Acolytes or Warriors) of drones. Finally, since Vexors use drones for most of their damage, they can manipulate transversal to considerable advantage when fighting other brawling doctrines.}} | This Vexor doctrine is another variant in a long line of afterburning, armor-tanked cruisers that use their low signature radius and moderate velocity to their advantage in brawling fights. Vexors also punch down very effectively against assault frigate or T3D gangs, since they can carry both a “damage” set (with a couple Ogres or, in alpha versions, a flight of Hammerheads) and an “application” set (Acolytes or Warriors) of drones. Finally, since Vexors use drones for most of their damage, they can manipulate transversal to considerable advantage when fighting other brawling doctrines.}} | ||
− | }} | + | |width=90%}} |
{{Template:CollapseBox|What areas of space is this doctrine best suited to?| | {{Template:CollapseBox|What areas of space is this doctrine best suited to?| | ||
{{quote|[[Image:Raido_Kudonen.jpg|36px|link=]] '''Raido Kudonen''' | {{quote|[[Image:Raido_Kudonen.jpg|36px|link=]] '''Raido Kudonen''' | ||
− | This doctrine is usable in all areas of space. However, see the “weaknesses” section, and note that most nullsec alliances and all wormhole alliances can readily form fleets using ships in the “exactly like this, but better” category. Roaming in nullsec with this fairly slow doctrine therefore depends on your ability to anticipate hostile forces’ movement and pre-position your fleet to engage or disengage as it best suits you. However, since dictors cost about twice as much as your Vexors, you can trade fairly well just by hazing tackle. }} | + | This doctrine is usable in all areas of space. However, see the “weaknesses” section, and note that most nullsec alliances and all wormhole alliances can readily form fleets using ships in the “exactly like this, but better” category. Roaming in nullsec with this fairly slow doctrine therefore depends on your ability to anticipate hostile forces’ movement and pre-position your fleet to engage or disengage as it best suits you. However, since dictors cost about twice as much as your Vexors, you can trade fairly well just by hazing tackle.}} |
− | }} | + | |width=90%}} |
{{Template:CollapseBox|How should the fleet be positioned when using this doctrine?| | {{Template:CollapseBox|How should the fleet be positioned when using this doctrine?| | ||
{{quote|[[Image:Raido_Kudonen.jpg|36px|link=]] '''Raido Kudonen''' | {{quote|[[Image:Raido_Kudonen.jpg|36px|link=]] '''Raido Kudonen''' | ||
Line 139: | Line 139: | ||
Against kiting gangs, such as Orthruses/Navy Ospreys/Caracals, you should damp the enemy out to the point that they must either close to your engagement range or go away. You have no ability to force kiting gangs to fight and should not try.}} | Against kiting gangs, such as Orthruses/Navy Ospreys/Caracals, you should damp the enemy out to the point that they must either close to your engagement range or go away. You have no ability to force kiting gangs to fight and should not try.}} | ||
− | }} | + | |width=90%}} |
{{Template:CollapseBox|Are there any fleet comp aspects that are critical to the doctrine?| | {{Template:CollapseBox|Are there any fleet comp aspects that are critical to the doctrine?| | ||
{{quote|[[Image:Raido_Kudonen.jpg|36px|link=]] '''Raido Kudonen''' | {{quote|[[Image:Raido_Kudonen.jpg|36px|link=]] '''Raido Kudonen''' | ||
Line 152: | Line 152: | ||
You should never undock any fleet without at least one interceptor scout; in nullsec, you need a couple ceptors and at least one dictor. In wormhole space, you need the same as null, plus at least one cloaky scout.}} | You should never undock any fleet without at least one interceptor scout; in nullsec, you need a couple ceptors and at least one dictor. In wormhole space, you need the same as null, plus at least one cloaky scout.}} | ||
− | }} | + | |width=90%}} |
{{Template:CollapseBox|Are there any unusual high priority targets when flying this doctrine?| | {{Template:CollapseBox|Are there any unusual high priority targets when flying this doctrine?| | ||
{{quote|[[Image:Raido_Kudonen.jpg|36px|link=]] '''Raido Kudonen''' | {{quote|[[Image:Raido_Kudonen.jpg|36px|link=]] '''Raido Kudonen''' | ||
If you’re trying to extract, you should kill tackle. Otherwise, you need to lock down and kill logi if at all possible, because Vexors have difficulty target switching to break reps on enemy DPS ships.}} | If you’re trying to extract, you should kill tackle. Otherwise, you need to lock down and kill logi if at all possible, because Vexors have difficulty target switching to break reps on enemy DPS ships.}} | ||
− | }} | + | |width=90%}} |
{{Template:CollapseBox|What are weaknesses of this doctrine? What situations is it not suited to?| | {{Template:CollapseBox|What are weaknesses of this doctrine? What situations is it not suited to?| | ||
{{quote|[[Image:Raido_Kudonen.jpg|36px|link=]] '''Raido Kudonen''' | {{quote|[[Image:Raido_Kudonen.jpg|36px|link=]] '''Raido Kudonen''' | ||
Line 169: | Line 169: | ||
Finally, high-projection doctrines that aren’t easily damped to your engagement range are a serious threat, and you should usually leave field after hazing tackle. Examples include Cerbs (~70km lock range with one damp), Jackdaws (~75-80km lock range with one damp), and blobs of Cormorants or Talwars (you can’t damp enough of them).}} | Finally, high-projection doctrines that aren’t easily damped to your engagement range are a serious threat, and you should usually leave field after hazing tackle. Examples include Cerbs (~70km lock range with one damp), Jackdaws (~75-80km lock range with one damp), and blobs of Cormorants or Talwars (you can’t damp enough of them).}} | ||
− | }} | + | |width=90%}} |
{{Template:CollapseBox|I like to fly in hisec, where CCP have decided not to allow command destroyers to boosh. Should I use something else for links?| | {{Template:CollapseBox|I like to fly in hisec, where CCP have decided not to allow command destroyers to boosh. Should I use something else for links?| | ||
{{quote|[[Image:Raido_Kudonen.jpg|36px|link=]] '''Raido Kudonen''' | {{quote|[[Image:Raido_Kudonen.jpg|36px|link=]] '''Raido Kudonen''' | ||
Line 184: | Line 184: | ||
* Warping around with battlecruisers in your cruiser fleet means you take longer to get places, which makes you more likely to be out of position and generally less likely to get content. So if you insist on bringing battlecruisers, you need a hyperspatial rig to keep up with the rest of the fleet. Which trades off with your buffer, which is literally the only good thing about links battlecruisers. Oops.}} | * Warping around with battlecruisers in your cruiser fleet means you take longer to get places, which makes you more likely to be out of position and generally less likely to get content. So if you insist on bringing battlecruisers, you need a hyperspatial rig to keep up with the rest of the fleet. Which trades off with your buffer, which is literally the only good thing about links battlecruisers. Oops.}} | ||
− | }} | + | |width=90%}} |
=== Fittings === | === Fittings === | ||
<wikifit doctrineid="36572" shipid="626" /> | <wikifit doctrineid="36572" shipid="626" /> | ||
<wikifit doctrineid="36572" shipid="625" /> | <wikifit doctrineid="36572" shipid="625" /> |
Revision as of 01:19, 10 May 2017
- Main article: Basic Learning for Aspiring Pilots
Talwars
Doctrine Q&A
What are key strengths of this doctrine? Why should I use it? | |||
---|---|---|---|
|
What areas of space is this doctrine best suited to? | |||
---|---|---|---|
|
How should the fleet be positioned when using this doctrine? | |||
---|---|---|---|
|
Are there any fleet comp aspects that are critical to the doctrine? | |||
---|---|---|---|
|
Are there any unusual high priority targets when flying this doctrine? | |||
---|---|---|---|
|
What are weaknesses of this doctrine? What situations is it not suited to? | |||
---|---|---|---|
|
How does tackle work for this kind of high range doctrine? | |||
---|---|---|---|
|
Fittings
Arbalest Compact Light Missile Launcher
Arbalest Compact Light Missile Launcher
Arbalest Compact Light Missile Launcher
Arbalest Compact Light Missile Launcher
Arbalest Compact Light Missile Launcher
Arbalest Compact Light Missile Launcher
Arbalest Compact Light Missile Launcher
F-90 Compact Sensor Booster
Medium Azeotropic Restrained Shield Extender
5MN Y-T8 Compact Microwarpdrive
Ballistic Control System I
Mark I Compact Power Diagnostic System
Micro Auxiliary Power Core I
Small Rocket Fuel Cache Partition I
Small Ancillary Current Router I
Small Hydraulic Bay Thrusters I
Inferno Light Missile x560
Mjolnir Light Missile x560
Caldari Navy Nova Light Missile x140
Caldari Navy Scourge Light Missile x140
Caldari Navy Inferno Light Missile x140
Caldari Navy Mjolnir Light Missile x140
Targeting Range Script x1
Scourge Light Missile x560
Nova Light Missile x560
Arbalest Compact Light Missile Launcher
Arbalest Compact Light Missile Launcher
Arbalest Compact Light Missile Launcher
Arbalest Compact Light Missile Launcher
Arbalest Compact Light Missile Launcher
Arbalest Compact Light Missile Launcher
Arbalest Compact Light Missile Launcher
Medium Shield Extender II
F-90 Compact Sensor Booster
5MN Y-T8 Compact Microwarpdrive
Ballistic Control System II
Crosslink Compact Ballistic Control System
Micro Auxiliary Power Core I
Small Ancillary Current Router I
Small Rocket Fuel Cache Partition I
Small Hydraulic Bay Thrusters I
Targeting Range Script x1
Caldari Navy Mjolnir Light Missile x140
Caldari Navy Inferno Light Missile x140
Scourge Light Missile x560
Inferno Light Missile x560
Mjolnir Light Missile x560
Caldari Navy Nova Light Missile x140
Caldari Navy Scourge Light Missile x140
Nova Light Missile x560
Caracals
Doctrine Q&A
What are key strengths of this doctrine? Why should I use it? | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
What areas of space is this doctrine best suited to? | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
How should the fleet be positioned when using this doctrine? | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Are there any fleet comp aspects that are critical to the doctrine? | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Are there any unusual high priority targets when flying this doctrine? | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
What are weaknesses of this doctrine? What situations is it not suited to? | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Fittings
Experimental SV-2000 Rapid Light Missile Launcher
Experimental SV-2000 Rapid Light Missile Launcher
Experimental SV-2000 Rapid Light Missile Launcher
Experimental SV-2000 Rapid Light Missile Launcher
Experimental SV-2000 Rapid Light Missile Launcher
Limited Adaptive Invulnerability Field I
50MN Quad LiF Restrained Microwarpdrive
Large Azeotropic Restrained Shield Extender
Limited 'Anointed' EM Ward Field
Large Azeotropic Restrained Shield Extender
Mark I Compact Power Diagnostic System
Damage Control I
Ballistic Control System I
Ballistic Control System I
Medium Anti-Thermal Screen Reinforcer I
Medium Anti-Kinetic Screen Reinforcer I
Medium Anti-Thermal Screen Reinforcer I
Warrior I x2
Caldari Navy Mjolnir Light Missile x475
Caldari Navy Inferno Light Missile x960
Caldari Navy Scourge Light Missile x475
Scourge Light Missile x1920
Inferno Light Missile x1920
Mjolnir Light Missile x1920
Caldari Navy Nova Light Missile x475
Nova Light Missile x1920
Nanite Repair Paste x40
Rapid Light Missile Launcher II
Rapid Light Missile Launcher II
Rapid Light Missile Launcher II
Rapid Light Missile Launcher II
Rapid Light Missile Launcher II
Adaptive Invulnerability Field II
Large Shield Extender II
50MN Quad LiF Restrained Microwarpdrive
Large Shield Extender II
EM Ward Field II
Ballistic Control System II
Ballistic Control System II
Ballistic Control System II
Damage Control II
Medium Anti-Thermal Screen Reinforcer I
Medium Anti-Kinetic Screen Reinforcer I
Medium Anti-Thermal Screen Reinforcer I
Warrior II x2
Inferno Fury Light Missile x1920
Mjolnir Fury Light Missile x1920
Nova Fury Light Missile x1920
Scourge Fury Light Missile x1920
Nanite Repair Paste x40
Medium Murky Compact Remote Shield Booster
Medium Murky Compact Remote Shield Booster
Medium 'Regard' Remote Capacitor Transmitter
Medium 'Regard' Remote Capacitor Transmitter
Medium Murky Compact Remote Shield Booster
Limited Adaptive Invulnerability Field I
Alumel-Wired Enduring Sensor Booster
50MN Y-T8 Compact Microwarpdrive
Limited Adaptive Invulnerability Field I
Large Azeotropic Restrained Shield Extender
Damage Control I
F-89 Compact Signal Amplifier
F-89 Compact Signal Amplifier
Medium Anti-EM Screen Reinforcer I
Medium Anti-Thermal Screen Reinforcer I
Medium Anti-EM Screen Reinforcer I
Warrior I x1
Light Shield Maintenance Bot I x3
Targeting Range Script x1
Scan Resolution Script x1
ECCM Script x1
Nanite Repair Paste x40
- If only training the base BLAP Logistics plan, Drones may not be usable.
- If both BLAP plans have been trained, Repair Drone Operation should be a minimal training investment.
Medium S95a Scoped Remote Shield Booster
Medium 'Regard' Remote Capacitor Transmitter
Medium S95a Scoped Remote Shield Booster
Medium 'Regard' Remote Capacitor Transmitter
Medium S95a Scoped Remote Shield Booster
Large Shield Extender II
50MN Y-T8 Compact Microwarpdrive
Sensor Booster II
Adaptive Invulnerability Field II
Adaptive Invulnerability Field II
Signal Amplifier II
Signal Amplifier II
Damage Control II
Medium Anti-EM Screen Reinforcer I
Medium Anti-EM Screen Reinforcer I
Medium Anti-Thermal Screen Reinforcer I
Light Shield Maintenance Bot I x3
Warrior II x1
Targeting Range Script x1
Scan Resolution Script x1
Nanite Repair Paste x40
ECCM Script x1
Vexors
Doctrine Q&A
What are key strengths of this doctrine? Why should I use it? | |||
---|---|---|---|
|
What areas of space is this doctrine best suited to? | |||
---|---|---|---|
|
How should the fleet be positioned when using this doctrine? | |||
---|---|---|---|
|
Are there any fleet comp aspects that are critical to the doctrine? | |||
---|---|---|---|
|
Are there any unusual high priority targets when flying this doctrine? | |||
---|---|---|---|
|
What are weaknesses of this doctrine? What situations is it not suited to? | |||
---|---|---|---|
|
I like to fly in hisec, where CCP have decided not to allow command destroyers to boosh. Should I use something else for links? | |||
---|---|---|---|
|
Fittings
Dual 150mm Compressed Coil Gun I
Dual 150mm Compressed Coil Gun I
Dual 150mm Compressed Coil Gun I
Dual 150mm Compressed Coil Gun I
10MN Monopropellant Enduring Afterburner
Kapteyn Compact Sensor Dampener
Faint Scoped Warp Disruptor
Drone Navigation Computer I
Damage Control I
'Refuge' Adaptive Nano Plating I
'Refuge' Adaptive Nano Plating I
Prototype Energized Explosive Membrane I
1600mm Crystalline Carbonide Restrained Plates
Medium Trimark Armor Pump I
Medium Trimark Armor Pump I
Medium Trimark Armor Pump I
Hobgoblin I x1
Ogre I x2
Hammerhead I x2
Hobgoblin I x4
Hammerhead I x3
Caldari Navy Antimatter Charge M x1280
Caldari Navy Thorium Charge M x1280
Caldari Navy Iron Charge M x1280
X5 Enduring Stasis Webifier x1
F-23 Compact Remote Sensor Booster x1
Kapteyn Compact Sensor Dampener x1
Initiated Compact Warp Scrambler x1
F-90 Compact Sensor Booster x1
Nanite Repair Paste x40
Targeting Range Dampening Script x2
Dual 150mm Railgun II
Dual 150mm Railgun II
Dual 150mm Railgun II
Dual 150mm Railgun II
Warp Disruptor II
Drone Navigation Computer I
Phased Muon Scoped Sensor Dampener
10MN Y-S8 Compact Afterburner
Coreli A-Type Explosive Plating
Energized Adaptive Nano Membrane II
Energized Adaptive Nano Membrane II
Damage Control II
1600mm Steel Plates II
Medium Trimark Armor Pump I
Medium Trimark Armor Pump I
Medium Trimark Armor Pump I
Hobgoblin II x4
Hammerhead II x2
Hobgoblin II x1
Hammerhead II x3
Ogre II x2
Spike M x2560
Caldari Navy Thorium Charge M x1920
Javelin M x2560
Scan Resolution Dampening Script x2
Targeting Range Dampening Script x2
Stasis Webifier II x1
Linked Enduring Remote Sensor Booster x1
Scan Resolution Script x1
Targeting Range Script x1
ECCM Script x1
Medium Solace Scoped Remote Armor Repairer
Medium Solace Scoped Remote Armor Repairer
Medium 'Regard' Remote Capacitor Transmitter
Medium 'Regard' Remote Capacitor Transmitter
Medium Solace Scoped Remote Armor Repairer
F-90 Compact Sensor Booster
10MN Monopropellant Enduring Afterburner
F-90 Compact Sensor Booster
Prototype Armor Explosive Hardener I
Prototype Armor Kinetic Hardener I
Damage Control I
800mm Crystalline Carbonide Restrained Plates
Prototype Armor Thermal Hardener I
Medium Trimark Armor Pump I
Medium Trimark Armor Pump I
Medium Anti-EM Pump I
Nanite Repair Paste x40
ECCM Script x2
Targeting Range Script x2
Scan Resolution Script x2
Medium 'Regard' Remote Capacitor Transmitter
Medium Solace Scoped Remote Armor Repairer
Medium Solace Scoped Remote Armor Repairer
Medium 'Regard' Remote Capacitor Transmitter
Medium Solace Scoped Remote Armor Repairer
Sensor Booster II
Sensor Booster II
10MN Y-S8 Compact Afterburner
Armor Explosive Hardener II
Damage Control II
Armor Kinetic Hardener II
800mm Steel Plates II
Armor Thermal Hardener II
Medium Anti-EM Pump I
Medium Trimark Armor Pump I
Medium Trimark Armor Pump I
Targeting Range Script x2
Nanite Repair Paste x40
ECCM Script x2
Scan Resolution Script x2