User:Titus tallang/BLAP doctrine sandbox: Difference between revisions

← Older edit Newer edit →

VisualWikitext

@@ Line 53: / Line 53: @@
 |width=90%}}
-{{Template:CollapseBox|The Talwar doctrine is the only doctrine on this page without any logistics fits. Why would you fly without logistics in a fleet?
+{{Template:CollapseBox|The Talwar doctrine is the only doctrine on this page without any logistics fits. Why would you fly without logistics in a fleet?|
+{{quote|[[Image:Raido_Kudonen.jpg|36px|link=]] '''Raido Kudonen'''
+Talwars are a harassment doctrine. A Talwar that receives sustained DPS from any source will die. You should either volley off enemies if you have enough ships to do so, trade a few Talwars in exchange for guaranteed kills on something bigger, or run away; extended engagements are a waste of time, effort, and ships.
+If you wanted to win extended fights on grid with long range kitey missile ships, you should be using Caracals. They have much greater tank than the Talwars and slightly better speed, although their cap life, warp speed, and signature are worse and their missile range is lower.
+For a kitey doctrine that flies very similar to Talwars but holds reps well, you might consider Jackdaws. Jackdaws have 23k ehp in defense mode, catch reps very well, have similar alpha and better DPS than Talwars, and are about the same speed (in SS mode) or much faster (in prop mode). The problem is that Jackdaws cost 70m-90m (depending on t1 or t2 rigs) and require more SP to train into. As a result, while they are still a relatively newbie-friendly doctrine by the standards of most PvP alliances, they're not as accessible as the BLAP ships.}}
 |width=90%}}