Toggle menu
Toggle preferences menu
Toggle personal menu
Not logged in
Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits.

User:Enig marr: Difference between revisions

19 editsJoined 29 August 2010
Enig marr (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Enig marr (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 46: Line 46:


This is also where I should note that if you where to use a MicroWarpDrive you might go 500% faster, however you will not get any damage mitigation from it, plus your signal radius will be 500% larger. Bottom line: using a MWD = very bad idea with a frigate. It will make you a very big bullseye, on an even bigger target. Interceptors are a different story though.
This is also where I should note that if you where to use a MicroWarpDrive you might go 500% faster, however you will not get any damage mitigation from it, plus your signal radius will be 500% larger. Bottom line: using a MWD = very bad idea with a frigate. It will make you a very big bullseye, on an even bigger target. Interceptors are a different story though.
='''Subjects I will still be adding in the "near future"'''=
'''Ranges'''
'''Ship Maneuvers'''


='''Directional Scan'''=
='''Directional Scan'''=
Line 65: Line 59:


D-Scan will take some practice but once you get the hang of it, it will greatly increase your survivability chances.
D-Scan will take some practice but once you get the hang of it, it will greatly increase your survivability chances.
='''Subjects I will still be adding in the "near future"'''=
'''Ranges'''
'''Ship Maneuvers'''


'''Safespots'''
'''Safespots'''