Difference between revisions of "Talk:Bookmark"
(Comment due to recent patch.) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Should the reference to Deep Safes be removed now that deep safes have been removed from game? | Should the reference to Deep Safes be removed now that deep safes have been removed from game? | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Using 4 celestials for un-aligned safe spots is unnecessary. == | ||
| + | |||
| + | In the section describing how to create an unaligned safe-spot, four (4) celestials are claimed to be needed, but you only need three (3). Instead of making two (2) aligned safe spots (A to B and then C to D) and then making the unaligned safe spot from these two (2) aligned locations, it suffices to make one (1) aligned safe spot (A to B) and then making the final unaligned spot from a system celestial C to the single aligned safe spot between A and B you just created. In other words it suffices to fix a point within the triangular area with vertices A, B and C. No need to waste time creating two aligned safe spots and then a final unaligned. | ||
Revision as of 15:22, 29 September 2010
Should the reference to Deep Safes be removed now that deep safes have been removed from game?
Using 4 celestials for un-aligned safe spots is unnecessary.
In the section describing how to create an unaligned safe-spot, four (4) celestials are claimed to be needed, but you only need three (3). Instead of making two (2) aligned safe spots (A to B and then C to D) and then making the unaligned safe spot from these two (2) aligned locations, it suffices to make one (1) aligned safe spot (A to B) and then making the final unaligned spot from a system celestial C to the single aligned safe spot between A and B you just created. In other words it suffices to fix a point within the triangular area with vertices A, B and C. No need to waste time creating two aligned safe spots and then a final unaligned.
