More actions
| Line 118: | Line 118: | ||
Rats jammed: 11 of 28 (39%)in one 9.60 second cycle. | Rats jammed: 11 of 28 (39%) in one 9.60 second cycle. | ||
Sensor strength doesn't seem to play a role since 100L towers jammed. | Sensor strength doesn't seem to play a role since 100L towers jammed. | ||
Total sensor strength jammed: 571L 400MGR out of 1382L 700MGR (41% 57%) | |||
Total sensor strength jammed: 571L 400MGR out of 1382L 700MGR (41% 57%) | |||
Median of jammed rats' sensor strength: 34L (100MGR), average: 51L (100MGR) | Median of jammed rats' sensor strength: 34L (100MGR), average: 51L (100MGR) | ||
The 41% 57% could suggest that the more variety of sensor types on the field, the better chance to jam. | |||
The 39% and 41% seem very close; perhaps the total sensor strength of all targeters plays more of a roll than each targeter ship's sensor strength. | |||
==Proposed Testing== | ==Proposed Testing== | ||