Talk:New Order

2014-10-17 Makie Tachibana: I originally wrote this page with the intent of giving readers a POV into the New Order that didn't involve parsing the RP Hell that is James 315's prose. As it seems that it has been used for unsavoury purposes, and Azmodeus Valar has removed the page, I'm okay with its removal and defer to the CEO's decision.

2014-10-06 Kadin Arbosa: The New Order have been claiming that E-Uni "vouches" for them, pointing to the section that says:

     there is some evidence that the New Order honors these "indulgences."

I have changed the language used to hopefully make it clearer that E-Uni is not actually vouching for the New Order, and simply reporting that there is some evidence for their indulgences being honored. Perhaps a simple "E-Uni does not vouch or in any way endorse the New Order" declaration would be better.

2014-10-07 Kadin Arbosa: I believe that the "not written from a neutral point of view" tag is not warranted. I am simply stating the facts. Unless E-Uni IS going to vouch for CODE, then the facts are: 1) we have had reports that CODE have honored their indulgences. 2) we have no evidence that it is universally honored. Given that my changes have been labeled as non-neutral, I will revert the changes I made, so as not to cause any issues.

Placed Under Protection and NPOV Template Re-Added

This page has recently seen high traffic and it's neutrality and validity is under question by Wiki Staff. You may file complaints under this comment. Enta en bauldry (talk) 22:13, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

This page has been scrubbed on the grounds of abuse in-game, misinforming players instead of providing educational value. Enta en bauldry (talk) 22:39, 7 October 2014 (UTC)