Difference between revisions of "Talk:Planetary Interaction"

From EVE University Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 38: Line 38:
  
 
[[User:Rix brannigan|Rix brannigan]] ([[User talk:Rix brannigan|talk]]) 20:11, 12 June 2012 (UTC)
 
[[User:Rix brannigan|Rix brannigan]] ([[User talk:Rix brannigan|talk]]) 20:11, 12 June 2012 (UTC)
 +
 +
The page is starting to get very confusing as it covers PI from the beginning perhaps a redraft is on order suggestions?

Revision as of 11:41, 26 October 2013

[02:41:34] Sognec El'Kendan > It looks like someone with 4/4 learning and +3 implants (arguably an 'average' learning setup) will have a reasonable starting skillset in about 1.5 days. Remote Sensing 3, Upgrades 3, Consolidation 2. From there the Planetology skill is available.

Factory World Formulae

Is the formula for the factory world profit-per-unit correct? The one given is:

 P2bid - ((P1aAsk + p1bAsk)*8) - 15.08 = profit-per-unit

I would have expected that 8 would be a 4 because you need 20 units of each P1 to make 5 units of your P2. So, I get:

 5*P2bid - (20*P1aAsk + 20*P1bAsk) - 5*15.08 = profit-per-five-units

Or, factoring out the 5:

 P2bid - ((P1aAsk + P1bAsk)*4) - 15.08 = profit-per-unit

Then again, perhaps I made a mistake?

Profit! Fee based on volumes.

This line in the "Profit!" paragraph:

TODO: Confirm details

Probably refers to:

Getting items off the planet costs a fee based on what you're launching, so shaving off volume will help!

Does anyone know? I will keep that posted here until someone takes care of it, but I will remove the TODO tag since it looks bad... this is sort of thing that should stay in the discussion page.

Jenna sol 03:43, 18 March 2012 (UTC)


I removed that line because it is very misleading. Export fees are actually based on the identity of the exported product (P1 vs. P2 etc). Higher quality products are smaller volume, but have dramatically increased tax rates. See here: http://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/Customs_Office

It might be worthwhile to include the export rates from that link as a part of a bigger overhaul of the article.

Rix brannigan (talk) 20:11, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

The page is starting to get very confusing as it covers PI from the beginning perhaps a redraft is on order suggestions?