More actions
m Anti-EM Screen Reinforcer -> EM Shield Reinforcer |
m →Tech 1 or Tech 2 modules?: Minor spelling |
||
| Line 418: | Line 418: | ||
Using Tech 2 modules will improve the tackler's performance, however they require somewhat better skills and are a lot more expensive and for some modules it might not be worth it on a Tech 1 frigate. | Using Tech 2 modules will improve the tackler's performance, however they require somewhat better skills and are a lot more expensive and for some modules it might not be worth it on a Tech 1 frigate. | ||
Keep in mind that there are so called 'meta' versions of all modules as well, which offer more performance than vanilla Tech 1 and one or more other specific bonuses. Meta modules are often very cheap, and in most cases should be used | Keep in mind that there are so called 'meta' versions of all modules as well, which offer more performance than vanilla Tech 1 and one or more other specific bonuses. Meta modules are often very cheap, and in most cases should be used instead of tech 1 modules whenever possible. | ||
A Tech 2 warp disruptor offers 4 km more range than any Tech 1 version and requires only one additional level of propulsion jamming, so it's very useful and in fact recommended for long range tacklers if they can afford it. Tech 2 damage controls are also significantly better than their Tech 1 counterparts, and Meta damage controls tend to be very expensive (and should thus only be used when the fitting space cannot be found anywhere else). | A Tech 2 warp disruptor offers 4 km more range than any Tech 1 version and requires only one additional level of propulsion jamming, so it's very useful and in fact recommended for long range tacklers if they can afford it. Tech 2 damage controls are also significantly better than their Tech 1 counterparts, and Meta damage controls tend to be very expensive (and should thus only be used when the fitting space cannot be found anywhere else). | ||