Difference between revisions of "Talk:Asteroids and ore"
(Created page with "Not sure exactly where I would weave it in, but this page could use the order of mining anoms in sov null too. Small, Medium, Large, Enormous, Colossal. Possibly with informat...") |
|||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Not sure exactly where I would weave it in, but this page could use the order of mining anoms in sov null too. Small, Medium, Large, Enormous, Colossal. Possibly with information from [https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=418719 this Fozzie update from 2015] but I don't know. --[[User:Vv mnc|Vv mnc]] ([[User talk:Vv mnc|talk]]) 08:15, 9 June 2017 (CDT) | Not sure exactly where I would weave it in, but this page could use the order of mining anoms in sov null too. Small, Medium, Large, Enormous, Colossal. Possibly with information from [https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=418719 this Fozzie update from 2015] but I don't know. --[[User:Vv mnc|Vv mnc]] ([[User talk:Vv mnc|talk]]) 08:15, 9 June 2017 (CDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Resource Distribution Update changes (2020-10-13.1) == | ||
| + | |||
| + | I've updated the ore table with the new mineral values and best qty/m3 details, but the sec status column needs a rework + to be expanded upon now that so many ore types have been shuffled around. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Maybe split the current Max Sec column into multiple columns, with availability & sec level listed separately for belts vs. anoms? Something like this: | ||
| + | |||
| + | {| class="wikitable sortable" | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | ! style="font-weight: bold;" | Ore | ||
| + | ! style="font-weight: bold;" | Appears in <br>Belts | ||
| + | ! style="font-weight: bold;" | Appears in </br>Anomalies | ||
| + | ! style="font-weight: bold;" | [[#Asteroid distribution|Quarter of EVE]] | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | Veldspar | ||
| + | | style="color: #2FEFEF;" | Highsec | ||
| + | | No | ||
| + | | All | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | Pyroxeres | ||
| + | | style="color: #2FEFEF;" | Highsec, <span style="color: #D77700;">Lowsec</span>, <span style="color: #F00000;">Nullsec</span> | ||
| + | | style="color: #D77700;" | Lowsec, <span style="color: #F00000;">Nullsec</span> | ||
| + | | Amarr, Caldari | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | Gneiss | ||
| + | | No | ||
| + | | style="color: #D77700;" | Lowsec, <span style="color: #F00000;">Nullsec</span> | ||
| + | | Amarr, Minmatar | ||
| + | |} | ||
| + | |||
| + | ...ideally with exact sec values listed down the line, once the dust has settled. | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[User:Ondralas Vatar|Ondralas Vatar]] ([[User talk:Ondralas Vatar|talk]]) 08:30, 17 October 2020 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 08:30, 17 October 2020
Not sure exactly where I would weave it in, but this page could use the order of mining anoms in sov null too. Small, Medium, Large, Enormous, Colossal. Possibly with information from this Fozzie update from 2015 but I don't know. --Vv mnc (talk) 08:15, 9 June 2017 (CDT)
Resource Distribution Update changes (2020-10-13.1)
I've updated the ore table with the new mineral values and best qty/m3 details, but the sec status column needs a rework + to be expanded upon now that so many ore types have been shuffled around.
Maybe split the current Max Sec column into multiple columns, with availability & sec level listed separately for belts vs. anoms? Something like this:
| Ore | Appears in Belts |
Appears in Anomalies |
Quarter of EVE |
|---|---|---|---|
| Veldspar | Highsec | No | All |
| Pyroxeres | Highsec, Lowsec, Nullsec | Lowsec, Nullsec | Amarr, Caldari |
| Gneiss | No | Lowsec, Nullsec | Amarr, Minmatar |
...ideally with exact sec values listed down the line, once the dust has settled.
Ondralas Vatar (talk) 08:30, 17 October 2020 (UTC)
