Toggle menu
Toggle preferences menu
Toggle personal menu
Not logged in
Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits.

Malediction: Difference between revisions

From EVE University Wiki
Thabink (talk | contribs)
Thabink (talk | contribs)
Undo revision 64976 by Rex adragoon (talk) Uh, what's wrong with this line? It's not untrue.
Line 84: Line 84:


==Summary==
==Summary==
Though the Malediction's 4 low slots and resist bonus might suggest an armor plated fit, this is usually a bad idea since an interceptor's main strength is its speed. The resist bonus does however work well with an armor repairer in some circumstances.
The Amarr fleet interceptor has an interesting set of bonuses being the only fleet interceptor with a bonus to tank. Though the Malediction's 4 low slots and resist bonus might suggest an armor plated fit, this is usually a bad idea since an interceptor's main strength is its speed. The resist bonus does however work well with an armor repairer in some circumstances.


The Malediction has 4 low slots and 3 mids, allowing it to fit the standard fleet tackler complement of either two tackle modules or a warp disruptor and a MSE in its mids. The Malediction has slightly above average grid, making fitting a MSE slightly easier. The Malediction's 4 low slots and slightly higher base speed than the Ares means the Malediction can support the best speed fit among the fleet interceptors.
The Malediction has 4 low slots and 3 mids, allowing it to fit the standard fleet tackler complement of either two tackle modules or a warp disruptor and a MSE in its mids. The Malediction has slightly above average grid, making fitting a MSE slightly easier. The Malediction's 4 low slots and slightly higher base speed than the Ares means the Malediction can support the best speed fit among the fleet interceptors.