m Rayanth moved page Talk:Wartime Standard Operating Procedures to Archive Talk:Wartime Standard Operating Procedures without leaving a redirect: Archived |
m Change link because of page move to the Archive NS. Change from http to https where applicable. |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Where's the old WSOP that the comments below are talking about? == | == Where's the old WSOP that the comments below are talking about? == | ||
On April 4, 2013, most of the previous WSOP requirements became recommendations and were moved (with some rewording) to the page [[ | On April 4, 2013, most of the previous WSOP requirements became recommendations and were moved (with some rewording) to the page [[Tips For War]]. | ||
== Breaking the WarSOP? == | == Breaking the WarSOP? == | ||
In the Requests for Clarification section, it talks about "[[ | In the Requests for Clarification section, it talks about "[[Archive:Student Guidance Department#I screwed up with the WSOP. What can I expect?|I screwed up with the WSOP. What can I expect?]]". | ||
Now that the WarSOP consists of "you can fly anything, but here are some tips" - what exactly is left that you can breach?! | Now that the WarSOP consists of "you can fly anything, but here are some tips" - what exactly is left that you can breach?! | ||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
Explaination | Explaination | ||
As an older noob player ( | As an older noob player (Sophomore literally means wise fool), I see a disconnect between the new players entering the UNI after the most recent WSOP changes and the older corporation members from before. The older page used to innately convey that high security war are serious business with big red and green rules for what you can and cannot do. The new one gives no such indication that high sec war might be serious, or that you might die. Instead, only a few sections down it eventually casually links to our tips on how to survive during wartime. That page is a wall of text that even the most studious applicants are not going to read during the already thorough application process. | ||
I fully support the new WSOP itself, but the current page needs to better address the needs of our newest players, who are just then applying to the UNI. By setting their expectations there, on a page they are supposed to read and summarize during the application process, I hope we can cut down on the proliferation of these threads. | I fully support the new WSOP itself, but the current page needs to better address the needs of our newest players, who are just then applying to the UNI. By setting their expectations there, on a page they are supposed to read and summarize during the application process, I hope we can cut down on the proliferation of these threads. | ||
| Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
**"Rigs should not be fitted on frigates, destroyers or cruisers." This statement is vague. Depending upon intent, it should be changed to "The University allows, but strongly recommends against, fitting rigs to frigates, destroyers, or cruisers" or "Rigs are prohibited on frigates, destroyers, and cruisers". | **"Rigs should not be fitted on frigates, destroyers or cruisers." This statement is vague. Depending upon intent, it should be changed to "The University allows, but strongly recommends against, fitting rigs to frigates, destroyers, or cruisers" or "Rigs are prohibited on frigates, destroyers, and cruisers". | ||
***"Trading while docked in a station, however moving items is prohibited." should be clarified to "Station Trading (that is, trading that does not require you to undock) is allowed. Using your University character to move items from one station to another is prohibited." | ***"Trading while docked in a station, however moving items is prohibited." should be clarified to "Station Trading (that is, trading that does not require you to undock) is allowed. Using your University character to move items from one station to another is prohibited." | ||
**"Dropping from E-UNI during the war - there are no penalties this." <-- Change to "Dropping from E-UNI during the war and rejoining the University after the war is over - there are no penalties for this." --[[User:Seamus | **"Dropping from E-UNI during the war - there are no penalties this." <-- Change to "Dropping from E-UNI during the war and rejoining the University after the war is over - there are no penalties for this." --[[User:Seamus Donohue|Seamus Donohue]] 07:17, 3 February 2010 (UTC) | ||
***Forum post is here! [http://www.eve-ivy.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=31&t=25963] [[User:Kelduum | ***Forum post is here! [http://www.eve-ivy.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=31&t=25963] [[User:Kelduum Revaan|Kelduum Revaan]] 19:33, 10 February 2010 (UTC) | ||
****The server and domain name recently changed. [ | ****The server and domain name recently changed. [https://forum.eveuniversity.org/viewtopic.php?f=31&t=25963 The new link can be found here]. --[[User:Miranda glade|Miranda Glade]] 13:01, 25 September 2010 (UTC) | ||
*****And now that thread has been locked, so I presume the correct place for making suggestions is on this page. --[[User:Miranda glade|Miranda Glade]] 00:04, 9 October 2010 (UTC) | *****And now that thread has been locked, so I presume the correct place for making suggestions is on this page. --[[User:Miranda glade|Miranda Glade]] 00:04, 9 October 2010 (UTC) | ||
* Explicitly add Orca to one of the ship categories? Yes, it's common sense, but I'm sure a rules lawyer would ''never'' try and argue that it wasn't technically in one of the categories... Heck, might as well add "Industrial Command Ship" to the Capital category, just in case someone has a Rorqual? [[User:Smoogle|Smoogle]] 04:14, 15 August 2010 (UTC) | * Explicitly add Orca to one of the ship categories? Yes, it's common sense, but I'm sure a rules lawyer would ''never'' try and argue that it wasn't technically in one of the categories... Heck, might as well add "Industrial Command Ship" to the Capital category, just in case someone has a Rorqual? [[User:Smoogle|Smoogle]] 04:14, 15 August 2010 (UTC) | ||
* "Ships must be fully 'PvP fitted'. " Forum Link Broken. Maybe replace with this one | * "Ships must be fully 'PvP fitted'. " Forum Link Broken. Maybe replace with this one https://forum.eveuniversity.org/viewtopic.php?f=129&t=19111 [[User:Yokitte|Yokitte]] 03:24, 24 September 2010 (UTC) | ||
* The WSOP contains a section on Promoted Activities. First item on the list is Fleet Operations. Yet, there is no link to the [[Fleet Operations During War Time]] policy page. I believe a link should be included. A precedent for this exists: The [[Wartime and Official ILN Operations Loot Policy]], a similar extended policy information page, is linked from the WSOP page. --[[User:Miranda glade|Miranda Glade]] 00:14, 9 October 2010 (UTC) | * The WSOP contains a section on Promoted Activities. First item on the list is Fleet Operations. Yet, there is no link to the [[Fleet Operations During War Time]] policy page. I believe a link should be included. A precedent for this exists: The [[Wartime and Official ILN Operations Loot Policy]], a similar extended policy information page, is linked from the WSOP page. --[[User:Miranda glade|Miranda Glade]] 00:14, 9 October 2010 (UTC) | ||
| Line 56: | Line 56: | ||
Hey guys: | Hey guys: | ||
Take a second, and read bullet 3 and bullet 4 of Non-Fleet | Take a second, and read bullet 3 and bullet 4 of Non-Fleet activities. I can easily see bullet 4 sounding like "Its ok to fly a cruiser or up, as long as I use warp core stabs." I don't think this was the intent of the bulletpoint.... | ||
<br> LJ Chimera | <br> LJ Chimera | ||
| Line 83: | Line 83: | ||
- From a Command.ILN conversation on 30 November 2010, Kyrlin clarified that pilots may not be in space in a covops without a fleet, as doing so looks like you (the covops pilot) are running exploration sites and will get you removed from the uni for a breach of W(artime)SOP. Suggest edit to the language of the Wartime SOP to reflect this. - Dimitri Grishenko 30/11/10 | - From a Command.ILN conversation on 30 November 2010, Kyrlin clarified that pilots may not be in space in a covops without a fleet, as doing so looks like you (the covops pilot) are running exploration sites and will get you removed from the uni for a breach of W(artime)SOP. Suggest edit to the language of the Wartime SOP to reflect this. - Dimitri Grishenko 30/11/10 | ||
- Based on the thread regarding the Privateer War at | - Based on the thread regarding the Privateer War at https://forum.eveuniversity.org/viewtopic.php?f=41&t=27151&hilit=scout&start=15, it is suggested that Faction probe launchers not be used. Consider clarifying. - Dimitri Grishenko 30/11/10 | ||
== ILN BG2 Wiki Updates == | == ILN BG2 Wiki Updates == | ||
| Line 161: | Line 161: | ||
== Looting and Salvaging Policy == | == Looting and Salvaging Policy == | ||
My proposed change to the ''Loot from war targets'' section of the [[Wartime Standard Operating Procedures]] page is below. The name of this section would change to ''Wartime Looting and Salvaging''. Along with this change I propose to delete the [[Wartime and Official ILN Operations Loot Policy]] page. This change will consolidate the Wartime loot policy to one place, and make it easier for new pilots to find and understand. This modification does not change anything inherent to the policy in this edit, it simply cleans it up a little. | My proposed change to the ''Loot from war targets'' section of the [[Archive:Wartime Standard Operating Procedures|Wartime Standard Operating Procedures]] page is below. The name of this section would change to ''Wartime Looting and Salvaging''. Along with this change I propose to delete the [[Wartime and Official ILN Operations Loot Policy]] page. This change will consolidate the Wartime loot policy to one place, and make it easier for new pilots to find and understand. This modification does not change anything inherent to the policy in this edit, it simply cleans it up a little. | ||
Proposed Change: | Proposed Change: | ||
Toggle search
Toggle menu
4.5K
7.6K
15.6K
232K
EVE University Wiki