Talk:Helios: Difference between revisions

(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)

Line 44:

I asked in the [http://forum.eveuniversity.org/viewtopic.php?f=129&t=87107 forums] for comments from experienced pilots on what changes might be made to make this fit work for a pilot with basic CovOps skills as listed.

~~Both~~ [http://forum.eveuniversity.org/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=25328 Kataki Soikutsu] and [http://forum.eveuniversity.org/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=41415 Dama Arishe] ~~suggested~~ replacing the Inertia Stabilizers II with a Co-Processor II. This suggestion works great.

[http://forum.eveuniversity.org/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=25328 Kataki Soikutsu], [http://forum.eveuniversity.org/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=25477 Jorn Rayl], [http://forum.eveuniversity.org/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=49956 Jet StreamZ], and [http://forum.eveuniversity.org/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=41415 Dama Arishe] suggest replacing the Inertia Stabilizers II with a Co-Processor II. This suggestion works great.

[http://forum.eveuniversity.org/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=13872 Daniel Wittaker] observed that the Expanded Probe Launcher II is probably a typo for Expanded Probe Launcher I since the Tech II version requires Astrometrics V instead of the Basic Skills, Astrometrics IV.

There was a bit of discussion about swapping the Microwarp Drive (MWD) for and Afterburner (AB), but the consensus in the thread seems to favor the MWD as a necessity for scouting in LowSec and NullSec.

Line 52:

Line 54:

Please feel free to comment on the proposed change to the Basic Skill Fleet Scout fit.

If the proposed change is acceptable, then would someone skilled in using the template, please replace the Inertia Stabilizers II with a Co-Processor II? Thank you.

If the proposed change is acceptable, then would someone skilled in using the template, please replace the Inertia Stabilizers II with a Co-Processor II and change Expanded Probe Launcher II to Expanded Probe Launcher I? Thank you.

@@ Line 44: / Line 44: @@
 I asked in the [http://forum.eveuniversity.org/viewtopic.php?f=129&t=87107 forums] for comments from experienced pilots on what changes might be made to make this fit work for a pilot with basic CovOps skills as listed.
-Both [http://forum.eveuniversity.org/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=25328 Kataki Soikutsu] and [http://forum.eveuniversity.org/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=41415 Dama Arishe] suggested replacing the Inertia Stabilizers II with a Co-Processor II. This suggestion works great.
+[http://forum.eveuniversity.org/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=25328 Kataki Soikutsu], [http://forum.eveuniversity.org/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=25477 Jorn Rayl], [http://forum.eveuniversity.org/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=49956 Jet StreamZ], and [http://forum.eveuniversity.org/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=41415 Dama Arishe] suggest replacing the Inertia Stabilizers II with a Co-Processor II. This suggestion works great.
+[http://forum.eveuniversity.org/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=13872 Daniel Wittaker] observed that the Expanded Probe Launcher II is probably a typo for Expanded Probe Launcher I since the Tech II version requires Astrometrics V instead of the Basic Skills, Astrometrics IV.
 There was a bit of discussion about swapping the Microwarp Drive (MWD) for and Afterburner (AB), but the consensus in the thread seems to favor the MWD as a necessity for scouting in LowSec and NullSec.
@@ Line 52: / Line 54: @@
 Please feel free to comment on the proposed change to the Basic Skill Fleet Scout fit.
-If the proposed change is acceptable, then would someone skilled in using the template, please replace the Inertia Stabilizers II with a Co-Processor II? Thank you.
+If the proposed change is acceptable, then would someone skilled in using the template, please replace the Inertia Stabilizers II with a Co-Processor II and change Expanded Probe Launcher II to Expanded Probe Launcher I? Thank you.