Difference between revisions of "Talk:Incursion fitting principles"
m (Djavin novienta moved page Talk:Fitting principles to Talk:Incursion fitting principles without leaving a redirect) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Split the page== | ==Split the page== | ||
| − | The article is getting a bit long and it is starting to outgrow its name a little, so I was considering moving out the Upgrade priorities section to a separate page. The reason is that I think the modularity would be more convenient, as well as the fact it would be easier to communicate to others – either linking, or 'teaching' the first section of the page as a class (or the second, if it came to that). Additionally I am getting a little tired of linking to the §[[ | + | The article is getting a bit long and it is starting to outgrow its name a little, so I was considering moving out the Upgrade priorities section to a separate page. The reason is that I think the modularity would be more convenient, as well as the fact it would be easier to communicate to others – either linking, or 'teaching' the first section of the page as a class (or the second, if it came to that). Additionally I am getting a little tired of linking to the §[[Incursion fitting principles#Upgrade priorities|Upgrade priorities]] section here. Should that be split off to another page, ie [[Upgrade priorities]]; or maybe merged into [[Ship progression in Incursions]]? Obviously the call on that should first be made on whether it is a good idea to split the section off, before deciding what the exact destination is. |
Reply here, with a : at the start to show you are replying if you are new, and the four tildes to sign/date. Alternatively we can move this discussion to the forums or IRC/Slack if necessary. [[User:Telinchei|Telinchei]] <sup>[[User talk:Telinchei|Talk]] · [[Special:Contributions/Telinchei|Contribs]]</sup> 06:51, 4 September 2015 (CDT) | Reply here, with a : at the start to show you are replying if you are new, and the four tildes to sign/date. Alternatively we can move this discussion to the forums or IRC/Slack if necessary. [[User:Telinchei|Telinchei]] <sup>[[User talk:Telinchei|Talk]] · [[Special:Contributions/Telinchei|Contribs]]</sup> 06:51, 4 September 2015 (CDT) | ||
:Cassiel seraphim suggested (verbally over comms) that they be kept together on the same page, to make it more coherent and reduce redundancy. So I guess the consensus is '''keep''' for now. [[User:Telinchei|Telinchei]] <sup>[[User talk:Telinchei|Talk]] · [[Special:Contributions/Telinchei|Contribs]]</sup> 08:19, 6 September 2015 (CDT) | :Cassiel seraphim suggested (verbally over comms) that they be kept together on the same page, to make it more coherent and reduce redundancy. So I guess the consensus is '''keep''' for now. [[User:Telinchei|Telinchei]] <sup>[[User talk:Telinchei|Talk]] · [[Special:Contributions/Telinchei|Contribs]]</sup> 08:19, 6 September 2015 (CDT) | ||
Revision as of 09:15, 11 January 2017
Split the page
The article is getting a bit long and it is starting to outgrow its name a little, so I was considering moving out the Upgrade priorities section to a separate page. The reason is that I think the modularity would be more convenient, as well as the fact it would be easier to communicate to others – either linking, or 'teaching' the first section of the page as a class (or the second, if it came to that). Additionally I am getting a little tired of linking to the §Upgrade priorities section here. Should that be split off to another page, ie Upgrade priorities; or maybe merged into Ship progression in Incursions? Obviously the call on that should first be made on whether it is a good idea to split the section off, before deciding what the exact destination is.
Reply here, with a : at the start to show you are replying if you are new, and the four tildes to sign/date. Alternatively we can move this discussion to the forums or IRC/Slack if necessary. Telinchei Talk · Contribs 06:51, 4 September 2015 (CDT)
