More actions
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
{{Weapon Systems Links}} | {{Weapon Systems Links}} | ||
==Hit chance== | ==Hit chance== | ||
A | A turret's chance to hit a target is calculated using the equation below. It will produce a result between 0 and 1, representing a probability between 0% and 100%. This value is then compared to a random number to see if the turret hits or misses. | ||
<math>\pagecolor{Black}\color{White}\text{Chance to Hit} = {0.5^{\left({\left({\frac{V_{angular} \times 40000m}{WAS \times sig_{target}}}\right)^{2} + \left({\frac{max(0, Distance - opt_{turret})}{fall_{turret}}}\right)^{2}}\right)}}</math> | <math>\pagecolor{Black}\color{White}\text{Chance to Hit} = {0.5^{\left({\left({\frac{V_{angular} \times 40000m}{WAS \times sig_{target}}}\right)^{2} + \left({\frac{max(0, Distance - opt_{turret})}{fall_{turret}}}\right)^{2}}\right)}}</math> | ||
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
[[File:Turret_HitChance_and_AverageDamage.PNG|650px|thumb|right|Click to enlarge]] | [[File:Turret_HitChance_and_AverageDamage.PNG|650px|thumb|right|Click to enlarge]] | ||
The hit chance equation has the form of ''x''<sup>(''a''+''b'')</sup>, which can also be written as ''x<sup>a</sup>x<sup>b</sup>''. In this case, x = 0.5, a = all tracking terms and b = all range terms. In other words, the hit chance equation can be thought of as having two separate parts (tracking and range), which are calculated individually and then multiplied at the end to get the final hit chance. This means that tracking and range don't interfere with one another, they are indeed two seperate things. | |||
The equation also shows that the reduction of hit chance from falloff and tracking respectively follow the same pattern. This is because they both look like ''0.5''<sup>(something / x)<sup>2</sup></sup>, where x is either tracking or falloff. The only differance between them are the input variables, the output look identical. | The equation also shows that the reduction of hit chance from falloff and tracking respectively follow the same pattern. This is because they both look like ''0.5''<sup>(something / x)<sup>2</sup></sup>, where x is either tracking or falloff. The only differance between them are the input variables, the output look identical. | ||
Example: At a range equal to optimal+falloff the range part of the equation becomes ''0.5''<sup>''1''</sup>, which means a 50% chance to hit. Against a target with the same angular velocity (rad/s) as a turrets tracking value multiplied with the targets size and divided by 40000m, the tracking part of the equation becomes ''0.5''<sup>''1''</sup>, which is also a 50% chance to hit. In the first case the full falloff range was used, in the second case the full turret tracking was used, and since they both follow the same pattern they end up at the same hit chance. | '''Example:''' At a range equal to optimal+falloff the range part of the equation becomes ''0.5''<sup>''1''</sup>, which means a 50% chance to hit. Against a target with the same angular velocity (rad/s) as a turrets tracking value multiplied with the targets size and divided by 40000m, the tracking part of the equation becomes ''0.5''<sup>''1''</sup>, which is also a 50% chance to hit. In the first case the full falloff range was used, in the second case the full turret tracking was used, and since they both follow the same pattern they end up at the same hit chance. | ||
===Falloff and optimal range=== | ===Falloff and optimal range=== | ||