More actions
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 115: | Line 115: | ||
1 - ( 1 - 8,39/54,2 )^2 * ( 1 - 2,80/54,2 )^2 = 0.357 = 36% | 1 - ( 1 - 8,39/54,2 )^2 * ( 1 - 2,80/54,2 )^2 = 0.357 = 36% | ||
It is clear that the gravimetric jammers are not helping much against augorors. If there are any ships with vulnurable sensors (Caldari ships in this case) on field then it may be better to jam them even if they weren't as important jamming targets. | It is clear that the gravimetric jammers are not helping much against augorors. If there are any ships with vulnurable sensors (Caldari ships in this case) on field then it may be better to jam them even if they weren't as important jamming targets. | ||
On the other hand if you had had a crystal ball with you when you fit your ship you could have fitted full rack of four radar jammers. In that case the probability to succesfully jam one enemy augoror would have been | |||
1 - ( 1 - 8,39/54,2 )^4 = 0.489... = 49% | |||
So far the examples have been about focusing all jams to single target. But the voice of your EWAR FC echoes in your mind ''"Spread the jams"'' | |||
If all jams are on one target you may succesfully jam the target with one jam and be happy, or you may succesfully jam the same target with two jammers and wonder if things could be better. But if you spread the jams to one jam per target the probability to jam ''at least'' one target does not change '''but''' there is the chance to jam multiple targets. | |||
Spreading four radar jamers to four different augorors gives you still the same 49% chance to jam at least one of them But you will also have the chance to jam two, three or four target. | |||
{| class="wikitable" border=0 | |||
| '''Numbers of targets jammed''' || '''probability''' | |||
|- | |||
| 0 || 51% | |||
|- | |||
| 1 || 37% | |||
|- | |||
| 2 || 10% | |||
|- | |||
| 3 || 1% | |||
|- | |||
| 4 || 0,06% | |||
|} | |||
== Skills to improve ECM == | == Skills to improve ECM == | ||