Toggle menu
Toggle preferences menu
Toggle personal menu
Not logged in
Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits.

System security: Difference between revisions

From EVE University Wiki
m Change unneeded piped link, making use of redirect and the link end trick.
Salartarium (talk | contribs)
m Eve -> EVE per MoS, link maintenance
Line 46: Line 46:


Constellations classified as NPC Null-Sec:
Constellations classified as NPC Null-Sec:
* '''38G6-L''' within Pure Blind, ''claimed by Sisters of Eve''
* '''38G6-L''' within Pure Blind, ''claimed by Sisters of EVE''
* '''N-K4Q0''' within Geminate, ''claimed by Society of Conscious Thought''
* '''N-K4Q0''' within Geminate, ''claimed by Society of Conscious Thought''
* '''Phoenix''' within Fountain, ''claimed by Serpentis''
* '''Phoenix''' within Fountain, ''claimed by Serpentis''
Line 155: Line 155:


=== Anchoring ===
=== Anchoring ===
The security level of a system may limit what may be [[Anchoring|anchored]] in that system. <ref>[https://community.eveonline.com/news/dev-blogs/starbase-changes-for-crius/ Dev blog: Starbase changes for Crius]</ref>
The security level of a system may limit what may be [[Anchoring|anchored]] in that system. <ref>[https://www.eveonline.com/news/view/starbase-changes-for-crius Dev blog: Starbase changes for Crius]</ref>


* 0.9 - 1.0: Containers may NOT be anchored. Starbases and starbase structures may be anchored except for structures requiring anchoring corp to have system [[sovereignty]].
* 0.9 - 1.0: Containers may NOT be anchored. Starbases and starbase structures may be anchored except for structures requiring anchoring corp to have system [[sovereignty]].
Line 170: Line 170:
Many security related mechanics use the true security instead of the rounded security status, however. A lower True-Sec system has better mission pay-outs than a higher True-Sec system, even if the displayed sec status is the same.
Many security related mechanics use the true security instead of the rounded security status, however. A lower True-Sec system has better mission pay-outs than a higher True-Sec system, even if the displayed sec status is the same.


The true security is not visible anywhere in game, instead it can be found in the [https://community.eveonline.com/community/fansites/toolkit/ official datadump] or from [https://esi.tech.ccp.is/latest/#/ ESI API]. Many third party mapping tools such as [https://evemaps.dotlan.net/ Dotlan] also show the true security.
The true security is not visible anywhere in game, instead it can be found in the [https://community.testeveonline.com/community/fansites/toolkit/ official datadump] or from [https://esi.tech.ccp.is/latest/#/ ESI API]. Many third party mapping tools such as [https://evemaps.dotlan.net/ Dotlan] also show the true security.


{{expansion past|width=50%|1=In the past, truesec values in the range (0.0, 0.5) were rounded half up, i.e. rounded down to 0.0 because all numbers in that range are below 0.5.  This was a bug, because EVE considers all systems above a truesec rating of 0.0 to be lowsec but the game displayed their security level as "0.0".  This bug not only caused some confusion (there were sentry guns within apparently Null-Sec systems) but also some problems in the form of inadvertent security status loss in what seemed like Null-Sec.
{{expansion past|width=50%|1=In the past, truesec values in the range (0.0, 0.5) were rounded half up, i.e. rounded down to 0.0 because all numbers in that range are below 0.5.  This was a bug, because EVE considers all systems above a truesec rating of 0.0 to be lowsec but the game displayed their security level as "0.0".  This bug not only caused some confusion (there were sentry guns within apparently Null-Sec systems) but also some problems in the form of inadvertent security status loss in what seemed like Null-Sec.