Toggle menu
Toggle preferences menu
Toggle personal menu
Not logged in
Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits.

Capacitor warfare: Difference between revisions

From EVE University Wiki
Line 360: Line 360:
<br>
<br>


In addition the following hardwirings are worth considering in addition to or in place of the Talisman set.
In addition the following hardwirings are worth considering in addition to or in place of the Talisman set:


Slot 6
Slot 6
*Engineering - 'Squire' Energy Systems Operation EO-6##, +(1-6)% faster capacitor recharge
*Engineering - 'Squire' Energy Systems Operation EO-6##, +(1-6)% faster capacitor recharge. Most pilots who use cap warfare, especially on dedicated ships, will use cap boosters. As such, cap recharge rate become a minor factor in cap warfare.
Slot 7
Slot 7
*Engineering - 'Squire' Energy Emission Systems ES-7##: -(1-6)% capacitor usage by cap warfare modules and energy transmitters
*Engineering - 'Squire' Energy Emission Systems ES-7##: -(1-6)% capacitor usage by cap warfare modules and energy transmitters. This implant has a significant impact on the capacitor usage of cap warfare modules. It however stacks with the Egress Port Maximizer rig.
Slot 8
Slot 8
*Engineering - 'Squire' Energy Management EM-8##: +(1-6)% capacitor size
*Engineering - 'Squire' Energy Management EM-8##: +(1-6)% capacitor size. This implant is more useful than the EO-6##, but less than the ES-7##. A bigger capacitor is always useful.
Slot 9 and slot 10
*No implant in slot 9 or slot 10 is useful to cap warfare
 
 
 
The cost versus effectiveness will have to be evaluated on a pilot by pilot basis but due to the huge increase in performance it is something worth considering.
<br>
<br>


==Boosters==
==Boosters==