Toggle menu
Toggle preferences menu
Toggle personal menu
Not logged in
Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits.

Superior Sleeper Cache: Difference between revisions

From EVE University Wiki
Djavin novienta (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Djavin novienta (talk | contribs)
Line 186: Line 186:


== Superior Sleeper Cache ==
== Superior Sleeper Cache ==
Of all the hacking sites, this one by name asserts itself as the most difficult and challenging. Actually, it's not an impenetrable fortress as some might presume, but it does make a good candidate for an [https://zkillboard.com/kill/55829802/ easy] and [https://zkillboard.com/kill/58178878/ costly lossmail] if you are looking for one, and a rather amusing ambush site at that, too. If you're diddling around in the Archive Room, there is a chance that you may just trip the alarm in the Turret room (if not done so already) to shake down visitors.
The '''Superior Sleeper Cache''' is a [[Cosmic Signature]] that can be found in known space using core scanner probes. The Superior Sleeper Cache is the most difficult of the Sleeper Cache sites, and is possibly the most difficult site that can be found via [[exploration]] that does no explicitly require combat. Pilots will be risking their ship when trying this or any other Sleep Cache. However, once familiar with these sites, pilots should be able to run the site without taking any damage. Like all Sleeper Cache sites, the Superior Sleeper Cache requires the use of both Data and Relic Analyzers. While ships up to battleships can enter this site, an exploration frigate is highly recommended in order to make use of their hacking bonuses.


Like the Standard Sleeper Cache, which I am operating under the assumption you read that guide first, which you should, there are a number of points where you can lose your ship rather handily, but coming prepared and informed, your personal risk is actually rather low. Obviously that does change a bit if you are in dangerous space, but otherwise, given the difficulty of scanning one of these sites down, you can operate with some degree of safety.  
Superior Sleeper Caches are incredibly difficult to scan down compared to most other signatures found in known space, and both excellent scanning skills as well as equipment are required to pinpoint the site completely.


I said scanning, and I may as well get that out of the way first. You need a probe strength of at least 103-ish to scan one of these sites down. 102 probe strength is definitely very close but not enough. I can scan one down with a tight cube formation with 104 probe strength. If you don't know how to see your probe strength, just press ALT + F to bring up the fitting window, and hover over the probe launcher. Look for the "Show Charge Info" icon and click it. Under the Attributes tab, you should see "Base Sensor Strength", and there is your probe strength there. If someone is already there, you could switch to combat probes and give him a visit or "share" the loot, if you know what that means. I try to respect the concept of site ownership, however if people abandon the site, I'll usually finish it.  
==Scanning==
A probe strength of at least 103 is needed to scan down a Superior Sleeper Cache. A probe strength of 102 will come very close, but will ultimately not be enough. With a probe strength of 104, the site can be located using a tight cube formation.
 
To view your probe strength:
#Open the fitting window and hover over the probe launcher.
#Click the "Show Charge Info" icon.
#Under the Attributes tab, you should see "Base Sensor Strength". This is your probe strength.
 
If another pilot has already entered the site, an alternate means of entry would be to switch to combat probes and give him a visit or "share" the loot, if you know what that means. I try to respect the concept of site ownership, however if people abandon the site, I'll usually finish it.  


As far as ships go, your choices have been explained suitably in the Preamble. I used a Heron for all my attempts, and it worked just fine, with the conditions being that it is not suitable for:
As far as ships go, your choices have been explained suitably in the Preamble. I used a Heron for all my attempts, and it worked just fine, with the conditions being that it is not suitable for: