Toggle menu
Toggle preferences menu
Toggle personal menu
Not logged in
Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits.

UniWiki:Manual of Style/Words to watch: Difference between revisions

From EVE University Wiki
Djavin novienta (talk | contribs)
Djavin novienta (talk | contribs)
Line 50: Line 50:


=== Editorializing ===
=== Editorializing ===
 
{{Color box|color=purple|width=75%|align=center
{{shortcut|WP:EDITORIAL|WP:OPED|WP:EDITORIALIZING}}
|<big>''Words to watch:'' '''... notably, it should be noted, interestingly, essentially, actually, clearly, of course, without a doubt, happily, tragically, aptly, fortunately, untimely, unfortunately, ...'''</big>
{{quote box|bgcolor=#FFFFF0|width=70%|align=center|salign=right
|quote={{big|''Words to watch:'' '''... notably, it should be noted, interestingly, essentially, actually, clearly, of course, without a doubt, happily, tragically, aptly, fortunately, untimely, unfortunately, ...'''}}
}}
}}
The use of adverbs such as ''notably'' and ''interestingly'', and phrases such as ''it should be noted'', to highlight something as particularly significant or certain without attributing that opinion, should usually be avoided so as to maintain an [[Wikipedia:Neutral point of view#Impartial tone|impartial tone]]. Words such as ''fundamentally, essentially'', and ''basically'' can indicate particular interpretative viewpoints, and thus should also be attributed in controversial cases. Care should be used with ''actually'', which implies that a fact is contrary to expectations; make sure that this is verifiable and not just assumed. ''Clearly, obviously, naturally'', and ''of course'' all presume too much about the reader's knowledge and perspective and often amount to excess verbiage. Wikipedia should not take a view as to whether an event was ''fortunate'' or not.
The use of adverbs such as ''notably'' and ''interestingly'', and phrases such as ''it should be noted'', to highlight something as particularly significant or certain without attributing that opinion, should usually be avoided so as to maintain an [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia:Neutral point of view#Impartial tone|impartial tone]]. Words such as ''fundamentally, essentially'', and ''basically'' can indicate particular interpretative viewpoints, and thus should also be attributed in controversial cases. Care should be used with ''actually'', which implies that a fact is contrary to expectations; make sure that this is verifiable and not just assumed. ''Clearly, obviously, naturally'', and ''of course'' all presume too much about the reader's knowledge and perspective and often amount to excess verbiage. The UniWiki should not take a view as to whether an event was ''fortunate'' or not.


{{quote box|bgcolor=#FFFFF0|width=70%|align=center|salign=right
{{Color box|color=purple|width=75%|align=center
|quote={{big|''Words to watch:'' '''... but, despite, however, though, although ...'''}}
|<big>''Words to watch:'' '''... but, despite, however, though, although ...'''</big>
}}
}}


More subtly, editorializing can produce [[WP:SYNTH|implications that are not supported by the sources]]. Words used to link two statements such as ''but'', ''despite'', ''however'', and ''although'' may imply a relationship where none exists, possibly unduly calling the validity of the first statement into question while giving undue weight to the credibility of the second.
More subtly, editorializing can produce [[Wikipedia:WP:SYNTH|implications that are not supported by the sources]]. Words used to link two statements such as ''but'', ''despite'', ''however'', and ''although'' may imply a relationship where none exists, possibly unduly calling the validity of the first statement into question while giving undue weight to the credibility of the second.


=== Synonyms for ''said''<span id="Various synonyms for ''said''"></span> ===
=== Synonyms for ''said''<span id="Various synonyms for ''said''"></span> ===