More actions
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
==Stacking penalties== | ==Stacking penalties== | ||
Stacking penalties refer to an effectiveness reduction that is incured when using two or more high, mid, and/or low slot modules (mods) that effect the same attribute. Most, but not all, mods show in thier discription if they are subject to this. | Stacking penalties refer to an effectiveness reduction that is incured when using two or more high, mid, and/or low slot modules (mods) that effect the same attribute. Most, but not all, mods show in thier discription if they are subject to this. | ||
===The Formula=== | |||
Stacking penalty for module number n is | |||
S(n) = 0.5^(((n-1) / 2.22292081) ^2) | |||
===The Numbers=== | ===The Numbers=== | ||
| Line 13: | Line 18: | ||
* Shield resist mods incure this penalty for the specific damage resisted when used in conjunction with Invulnerablity Fields | * Shield resist mods incure this penalty for the specific damage resisted when used in conjunction with Invulnerablity Fields | ||
See also [[Module Stacking and Speed Modules]]. | |||
Revision as of 21:51, 24 September 2010
Stacking penalties
Stacking penalties refer to an effectiveness reduction that is incured when using two or more high, mid, and/or low slot modules (mods) that effect the same attribute. Most, but not all, mods show in thier discription if they are subject to this.
The Formula
Stacking penalty for module number n is
S(n) = 0.5^(((n-1) / 2.22292081) ^2)
The Numbers
1st mod: 100,00% effectiveness
2nd mod: 86,91% effectiveness
3rd mod: 57,06% effectiveness
4th mod: 28,30% effectiveness
5th mod: 10,60% effectiveness
- Shield resist mods incure this penalty for the specific damage resisted when used in conjunction with Invulnerablity Fields
See also Module Stacking and Speed Modules.