More actions
→Commander Frigate Domination Thug in Part 1?: new section |
m Add section . Add unsigned by. |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Unnamed == | |||
RoPoem advised that in part 1, they had an occasion where the Domination pirate did not appear. | RoPoem advised that in part 1, they had an occasion where the Domination pirate did not appear. | ||
They further advised that upon killing the cruiser a popup message "Here the pirates have ditched one of their damaged frigates. At first it seems not that badly damaged, but further investigation shows the interior is totally burnt out. This looks to be a dead end." | They further advised that upon killing the cruiser a popup message "Here the pirates have ditched one of their damaged frigates. At first it seems not that badly damaged, but further investigation shows the interior is totally burnt out. This looks to be a dead end." -- Previous, unsigned, comment by [[User:Dropbear Maroon|Dropbear Maroon]] ([[User talk:Dropbear Maroon|talk]]) 01:03, 10 August 2025 (UTC) | ||
== Commander Frigate Domination Thug in Part 1? == | == Commander Frigate Domination Thug in Part 1? == | ||
Maybe not 1xCommander and 0-1 x Commander Frigate Domination Thug? Because i haven't him in Part 1. [[User:Lvivs | Maybe not 1xCommander and 0-1 x Commander Frigate Domination Thug? Because i haven't him in Part 1. [[User:Lvivs'ka Kava|Lvivs'ka Kava]] ([[User talk:Lvivs'ka Kava|talk]]) 01:03, 10 August 2025 (UTC) | ||