Stacking penalties

Stacking penalties

Stacking penalties refer to an effectiveness reduction that is incurred when using two or more modules or rigs that affect the same attribute. Most, but not all, mods show in their discription if they are subject to this. Modules affected by stacking penalty multiplier include, but are not limited to: Electronic Warfare (target painters, webbers), resistance bonuses (hardeners, etc), Ship speed modules (nanofiber structure, inertia stabilizers and overdrive injectors), and others.

Note that it is the stat bonus that is affected, not the module itself.  For example, if you have a nanofiber internal structure (agility and velocity) and an overdrive injector system (velocity), the nano's velocity bonus would suffer a stacking penalty, but not its agility bonus.

Also of note is that module drawbacks (negative effects) can also be stacking penalized.

The Formula

The stacking penalty for module number n is

S(n) = 0.5^(((n-1) / 2.22292081) ^2)

The Numbers

1st mod: 100.00% effectiveness

2nd mod: 86.9% effectiveness

3rd mod: 57.1% effectiveness

4th mod: 28.3% effectiveness

5th mod: 10.6% effectiveness

6th mod: 3.0% effectiveness

As is clear, stacking more than 3 or 4 modules - unless you really have nothing else at all that you could fit there - that affect the same stat is fairly pointless, as your benefit is so tiny.

What suffers stacking penalties?

The first thing to note is that absolute effects are never stacking-penalized, only percentage effects. That is to say, things like +1 warp core strength, +1000 structure HP, +15m signature radius, +400 GJ capacitor are not stacking-penalized because they are not percentage (%) effects.

The second thing is that only modules and rigs are stacking-penalized. Skills, implants and boosters are not. There is one exception to this, and that is the Snake pirate implant sets (the ones that affect velocity), which are stacking-penalized.

It can be hard to tell exactly what suffers stacking penalties and what does not.  For instance, the Overdrive Injector System II gives +12.5% velocity at a cost of -20% cargo capacity, and the description claims it suffers stacking penalties.  The velocity bonus is stacking-penalized, but the cargo drawback is actually not.  Similarly, the Warp Core Stabilizer II gives you one extra warp core strength at a cost of -40% targeting range and -40% scan resolution. It doesn't mention stacking penalty in the description, but the drawbacks are actually stacking-penalized.

We can learn from this that it is not the module itself which determines whether its effects are stacking-penalized, but rather the attribute affected.

Here's a handy table of what ship effects are stacking-penalized and which aren't. It has an important footnote and is not yet complete. Remember, only percentage effects are penalized, never absolute value effects.

Ship attribute	Is it stacking penalized?
Powergrid (including reduced-PG-need effects)	no
CPU (including reduced-CPU-need effects)	no
Cargo capacity	no
Capacitor capacity	no
Capacitor recharge rate	no
Shield recharge rate	no
Shield / armor / hull HP	no
Shield / armor / hull resistances	yes1
Sensor strength (including ECM jam strength)	yes
Scan resolution	yes
Targeting range	yes
Signature radius	yes
Velocity	yes
Inertia modifier (agility)	yes
Missile launcher rate of fire	yes
Missile damage	yes
Missile explosion velocity	no
Missile explosion radius	no
Missile flight time	yes
Missile velocity	yes
Turret rate of fire	yes
Turret damage modifier	yes
All optimal range (modules/turrets)	yes
All falloff (modules/turrets)	yes

¹ Damage Control modules are never stacking-penalized. They are ignored when working out which resistance bonuses are penalized, and always give their full effect.

See also Module Stacking and Speed Modules.