Toggle menu
Toggle preferences menu
Toggle personal menu
Not logged in
Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits.

Stacking penalties: Difference between revisions

From EVE University Wiki
Kivena (talk | contribs)
Kivena (talk | contribs)
Line 151: Line 151:
If, however, you fit ''both'', then one of them (whichever is less effective) will count as a second module and be stacking penalized accordingly (so, 86.9% effective).  This is in addition to your normal resistance modules, of which one will give its full effect and the rest stacking penalized as explained above.
If, however, you fit ''both'', then one of them (whichever is less effective) will count as a second module and be stacking penalized accordingly (so, 86.9% effective).  This is in addition to your normal resistance modules, of which one will give its full effect and the rest stacking penalized as explained above.


As an example, consider the following modules fitted to your fit and their effectiveness:  one Damage Control (100% effective), one Reactive Armor Hardener (86.9% effective), one Armor EM Hardener (100% effective), one Energized Adaptive Membrane (EM resistance 86.9% effective, other resistances 100% effective) and one Adaptive Nano Plating (EM resistance 57.1% effective, other resistances 86.9% effective)
As an example, consider the following five modules all fitted to your fit and their resulting effectiveness:  one Damage Control ''(100% effective)'', and one Reactive Armor Hardener ''(86.9% effective)''; one Armor EM Hardener ''(100% effective)'', one Energized Adaptive Membrane ''(EM resistance 86.9% effective, other resistances 100% effective)'', and one Adaptive Nano Plating ''(EM resistance 57.1% effective, other resistances 86.9% effective)''


<br>  
<br>  


See also [[Module Stacking and Speed Modules]].
See also [[Module Stacking and Speed Modules]].