User:Nors phlebas sabelhpsron/To T2 or Not to T2: Difference between revisions

← Older edit Newer edit →

VisualWikitext

Revision as of 00:09, 20 July 2013 view source Sichlor auscent (talk \| contribs) 266 edits m added footnotes ← Older edit		Revision as of 11:42, 29 October 2013 view source Noemie belacqua (talk \| contribs) 2,463 edits m →Obvious Work in Progress is Obvious: Add link Newer edit →
Line 2:		Line 2:


	One of the first things that new players have to overcome is the confusing world of Meta and Tech levels for modules. Most people quickly come to the conclusion that higher Meta Level = better, and equally that higher Tech levels = better. Whilst intuitive, this rule is confusingly not always true - there are a number of modules where the Meta 4 variant is objectively superior to the Tech 2 (Meta 5) equivalent, meaning that ''for those modules, ''to get the most bang for your buck you should always fit the Meta 4. This page is intended to clarify which modules you should fix Meta 4 of rather than going to Tech 2. Only modules where the Meta 4 is better will be listed, and only the attributes that differ will be listed. All other attributes should be equal.		One of the first things that new players have to overcome is the confusing world of [[Techs, Tiers and Meta levels\|Meta and Tech levels]] for modules. Most people quickly come to the conclusion that higher Meta Level = better, and equally that higher Tech levels = better. Whilst intuitive, this rule is confusingly not always true - there are a number of modules where the Meta 4 variant is objectively superior to the Tech 2 (Meta 5) equivalent, meaning that ''for those modules, ''to get the most bang for your buck you should always fit the Meta 4. This page is intended to clarify which modules you should fix Meta 4 of rather than going to Tech 2. Only modules where the Meta 4 is better will be listed, and only the attributes that differ will be listed. All other attributes should be equal.

	== Example ==		== Example ==