User:Cassiel Seraphim/Sandbox3: Difference between revisions

Line 157:

A ship with fewer modules or rigs stacking will also benefit more from boosts, thus not suffering quite as much as they might initially seem to.

Further down this page you'll see examples of this with the advanced setups, if you pay attention to the normal resist profiles vs the resist profile with offgrid boosts. The EM-rig setup for vanguards for example has a deceptively low EM/thermal resist, averaging around 61% instead of the recommended 70%. This would suggest ~~a hefty~~ +30% more damage taken from turret damage, as your resists are 9% lower (see the graph above). But due to less stacking penalties that setup ends up having roughly 70% average EM/thermal resists after boosts which is fairly close to the 73% of our recommended fits and will eventually only take +10% more damage from turrets, while taking torpedoes just fine.

Further down this page you'll see examples of this with the advanced setups, if you pay attention to the normal resist profiles vs the resist profile with offgrid boosts. The EM-rig setup for vanguards for example has a deceptively low EM/thermal resist, averaging around 62% instead of the recommended 70%. This would suggest nearly +30% more damage taken from turret damage, as your resists are almost 9% lower (see the graph above). But due to less stacking penalties that setup ends up having roughly 69% average EM/thermal resists after boosts which is fairly close to the 72% of our recommended fits and will eventually only take +10% more damage from turrets, while taking torpedoes just fine.

= Battleship setups =

@@ Line 157: / Line 157: @@
 A ship with fewer modules or rigs stacking will also benefit more from boosts, thus not suffering quite as much as they might initially seem to.
-Further down this page you'll see examples of this with the advanced setups, if you pay attention to the normal resist profiles vs the resist profile with offgrid boosts. The EM-rig setup for vanguards for example has a deceptively low EM/thermal resist, averaging around 61% instead of the recommended 70%. This would suggest a hefty +30% more damage taken from turret damage, as your resists are 9% lower (see the graph above). But due to less stacking penalties that setup ends up having roughly 70% average EM/thermal resists after boosts which is fairly close to the 73% of our recommended fits and will eventually only take +10% more damage from turrets, while taking torpedoes just fine.
+Further down this page you'll see examples of this with the advanced setups, if you pay attention to the normal resist profiles vs the resist profile with offgrid boosts. The EM-rig setup for vanguards for example has a deceptively low EM/thermal resist, averaging around 62% instead of the recommended 70%. This would suggest nearly +30% more damage taken from turret damage, as your resists are almost 9% lower (see the graph above). But due to less stacking penalties that setup ends up having roughly 69% average EM/thermal resists after boosts which is fairly close to the 72% of our recommended fits and will eventually only take +10% more damage from turrets, while taking torpedoes just fine.
 = Battleship setups =