Difference between revisions of "Talk:Titans"

From EVE University Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "Even if the page in its current status doesn't has a lot of content, Titans are an important ship class in this game and need their own page. The stub info box clearly signals...")
 
m (Response)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
Even if the page in its current status doesn't has a lot of content, Titans are an important ship class in this game and need their own page. The stub info box clearly signals that you should rather expand it instead of removing. It's really not that hard to flesh out this page even if you're not in a nullsec alliance. [[User:Erwin Madelung|Erwin Madelung]] ([[User talk:Erwin Madelung|talk]]) 14:24, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
 
Even if the page in its current status doesn't has a lot of content, Titans are an important ship class in this game and need their own page. The stub info box clearly signals that you should rather expand it instead of removing. It's really not that hard to flesh out this page even if you're not in a nullsec alliance. [[User:Erwin Madelung|Erwin Madelung]] ([[User talk:Erwin Madelung|talk]]) 14:24, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
 +
: In theory a fully agree. However nobody has done anything to this article since November 2017. And it is not the amount of content I worry about but the content being exactly the same as in the [[Capital ships]] page. So the "Main article" link there is a bit of a misnomer as this article does not contain any more information.  --[[User:Evon R'al|Evon R'al]] ([[User talk:Evon R'al|talk]]) 14:34, 22 December 2021 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 14:34, 22 December 2021

Even if the page in its current status doesn't has a lot of content, Titans are an important ship class in this game and need their own page. The stub info box clearly signals that you should rather expand it instead of removing. It's really not that hard to flesh out this page even if you're not in a nullsec alliance. Erwin Madelung (talk) 14:24, 22 December 2021 (UTC)

In theory a fully agree. However nobody has done anything to this article since November 2017. And it is not the amount of content I worry about but the content being exactly the same as in the Capital ships page. So the "Main article" link there is a bit of a misnomer as this article does not contain any more information. --Evon R'al (talk) 14:34, 22 December 2021 (UTC)