Talk:Incursion fitting principles: Difference between revisions

(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)

Line 1:

==Split the page==

The article is getting a bit long and it is starting to outgrow its name a little, so I was considering moving out the Upgrade priorities section to a separate page. The reason is that I think the modularity would be more convenient, as well as the fact it would be easier to communicate to others – either linking, or 'teaching' the first section of the page as a class (or the second, if it came to that). Additionally I am getting a little tired of linking to the §[[~~Fitting~~ principles#Upgrade priorities|Upgrade priorities]] section here. Should that be split off to another page, ie [[Upgrade priorities]]; or maybe merged into [[Ship progression in Incursions]]? Obviously the call on that should first be made on whether it is a good idea to split the section off, before deciding what the exact destination is.

The article is getting a bit long and it is starting to outgrow its name a little, so I was considering moving out the Upgrade priorities section to a separate page. The reason is that I think the modularity would be more convenient, as well as the fact it would be easier to communicate to others – either linking, or 'teaching' the first section of the page as a class (or the second, if it came to that). Additionally I am getting a little tired of linking to the §[[Incursion fitting principles#Upgrade priorities|Upgrade priorities]] section here. Should that be split off to another page, ie [[Upgrade priorities]]; or maybe merged into [[Ship progression in Incursions]]? Obviously the call on that should first be made on whether it is a good idea to split the section off, before deciding what the exact destination is.

Reply here, with a : at the start to show you are replying if you are new, and the four tildes to sign/date. Alternatively we can move this discussion to the forums or IRC/Slack if necessary. [[User:Telinchei|Telinchei]] [[User talk:Telinchei|Talk]] · [[Special:Contributions/Telinchei|Contribs]] 06:51, 4 September 2015 (CDT)

:Cassiel seraphim suggested (verbally over comms) that they be kept together on the same page, to make it more coherent and reduce redundancy. So I guess the consensus is '''keep''' for now. [[User:Telinchei|Telinchei]] [[User talk:Telinchei|Talk]] · [[Special:Contributions/Telinchei|Contribs]] 08:19, 6 September 2015 (CDT)

== Logistics Advanced Upgrades - Dspace/Faction slot saving ==

It has been recently discussed we should advance discussion on EHP and tank profiles of Logistics at this stage so that people know what to shoot for with the DCU/AB/Invuln + triple Remote Tracking fit in theoretical fitting. It may be worth extending the documentation to cover that fit, and the PithInvuln/quad Remote Tracking non-ore fit also. [[User:Telinchei|Telinchei]] [[User talk:Telinchei|Talk]] · [[Special:Contributions/Telinchei|Contribs]] 20:49, 3 August 2019 (CDT)

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 ==Split the page==
-The article is getting a bit long and it is starting to outgrow its name a little, so I was considering moving out the Upgrade priorities section to a separate page. The reason is that I think the modularity would be more convenient, as well as the fact it would be easier to communicate to others &ndash; either linking, or 'teaching' the first section of the page as a class (or the second, if it came to that). Additionally I am getting a little tired of linking to the §[[Fitting principles#Upgrade priorities|Upgrade priorities]] section here. Should that be split off to another page, ie [[Upgrade priorities]]; or maybe merged into [[Ship progression in Incursions]]? Obviously the call on that should first be made on whether it is a good idea to split the section off, before deciding what the exact destination is.
+The article is getting a bit long and it is starting to outgrow its name a little, so I was considering moving out the Upgrade priorities section to a separate page. The reason is that I think the modularity would be more convenient, as well as the fact it would be easier to communicate to others &ndash; either linking, or 'teaching' the first section of the page as a class (or the second, if it came to that). Additionally I am getting a little tired of linking to the §[[Incursion fitting principles#Upgrade priorities|Upgrade priorities]] section here. Should that be split off to another page, ie [[Upgrade priorities]]; or maybe merged into [[Ship progression in Incursions]]? Obviously the call on that should first be made on whether it is a good idea to split the section off, before deciding what the exact destination is.
 Reply here, with a : at the start to show you are replying if you are new, and the four tildes to sign/date. Alternatively we can move this discussion to the forums or IRC/Slack if necessary. [[User:Telinchei|Telinchei]] <sup>[[User talk:Telinchei|Talk]] &middot; [[Special:Contributions/Telinchei|Contribs]]</sup> 06:51, 4 September 2015 (CDT)
 :Cassiel seraphim suggested (verbally over comms) that they be kept together on the same page, to make it more coherent and reduce redundancy. So I guess the consensus is '''keep''' for now. [[User:Telinchei|Telinchei]] <sup>[[User talk:Telinchei|Talk]] &middot; [[Special:Contributions/Telinchei|Contribs]]</sup> 08:19, 6 September 2015 (CDT)
+== Logistics Advanced Upgrades - Dspace/Faction slot saving ==
+It has been recently discussed we should advance discussion on EHP and tank profiles of Logistics at this stage so that people know what to shoot for with the DCU/AB/Invuln + triple Remote Tracking fit in theoretical fitting. It may be worth extending the documentation to cover that fit, and the PithInvuln/quad Remote Tracking non-ore fit also. [[User:Telinchei|Telinchei]] <sup>[[User talk:Telinchei|Talk]] &middot; [[Special:Contributions/Telinchei|Contribs]]</sup> 20:49, 3 August 2019 (CDT)