Difference between revisions of "Talk:Rigs"
From EVE University Wiki
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
I copied a table from some of the other ones on the wiki, but I'm not sure if it's a good fit for this page. Anyone have any thoughts on whether it works? Or what could improve it? | I copied a table from some of the other ones on the wiki, but I'm not sure if it's a good fit for this page. Anyone have any thoughts on whether it works? Or what could improve it? | ||
− | {| class="wikitable | + | {| class="wikitable" style="font-size:90%;text-align:center;" |
! style="background-color:#222222;text-align:left;" | Name | ! style="background-color:#222222;text-align:left;" | Name | ||
! style="background-color:#222222;" | Effect | ! style="background-color:#222222;" | Effect | ||
Line 57: | Line 57: | ||
:I was thinking of something similar yesterday, and I think it's a good idea. I would perhaps remove the skill column and mention it in the introductory text above each table, as it's the same for each group of rigs. I would also left-align the text, as it makes it easier to read. | :I was thinking of something similar yesterday, and I think it's a good idea. I would perhaps remove the skill column and mention it in the introductory text above each table, as it's the same for each group of rigs. I would also left-align the text, as it makes it easier to read. | ||
:Additionally, I was thinking of a "note" column - but it would be empty about 80% of the time, perhaps notes as text below each table would be better? [[User:Noemie_belacqua|Noemie]] [[User_talk:Noemie_belacqua|Belacqua]] 02:55, 29 November 2016 (CST) | :Additionally, I was thinking of a "note" column - but it would be empty about 80% of the time, perhaps notes as text below each table would be better? [[User:Noemie_belacqua|Noemie]] [[User_talk:Noemie_belacqua|Belacqua]] 02:55, 29 November 2016 (CST) | ||
+ | |||
+ | ::Yeah, makes sense to drop the skill column. I think the only case of a rig using a different skill than its group is the odd case of the Salvage Tackle, which can be easily explained with a note at the bottom. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ::Updated table: | ||
+ | ::{| class="wikitable collapsible" style="font-size:90%;" | ||
+ | ! style="background-color:#222222;" | Name | ||
+ | ! style="background-color:#222222;" | Effect | ||
+ | ! style="background-color:#222222;" | Downside | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | '''Anti-EM Armor Pump'''<ref name="note1">Wubba dubba do doo</ref> | ||
+ | | Increase armor resistance to EM damage | ||
+ | | Decreases ship's maximum velocity | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | '''Trimark Armor Pump''' | ||
+ | | Increase armor resistance to explosive damage | ||
+ | | Decreases ship's maximum velocity | ||
+ | |} | ||
+ | ::<small><references></references></small> | ||
+ | ::Do you think it would be appropriate to use multi row spanning cells, like at [[smartbombs]], for the Downside column? --[[User:Al hubbard|Al hubbard]] ([[User talk:Al hubbard|talk]]) 13:55, 29 November 2016 (CST) | ||
+ | |||
+ | :::Very nice! Yes, I think using multi-row cells would be OK. I just tested it and it even works well with column sorting (which shouldn't be needed here), and IMO it makes the information easier to skim. [[User:Noemie_belacqua|Noemie]] [[User_talk:Noemie_belacqua|Belacqua]] 14:46, 29 November 2016 (CST) |
Latest revision as of 02:40, 23 January 2017
Table for rig lists
I copied a table from some of the other ones on the wiki, but I'm not sure if it's a good fit for this page. Anyone have any thoughts on whether it works? Or what could improve it?
Name | Effect | Downside | Skill |
---|---|---|---|
Anti-EM Armor Pump | Increase armor resistance to EM damage | Decreases ship's maximum velocity | Armor Rigging |
Anti-Explosive Armor Pump | Increase armor resistance to explosive damage | Decreases ship's maximum velocity | Armor Rigging |
Anti-Kinetic Armor Pump | Increase armor resistance to kinetic damage | Decreases ship's maximum velocity | Armor Rigging |
Anti-Thermal Armor Pump | Increase armor resistance to thermal damage | Decreases ship's maximum velocity | Armor Rigging |
Auxillary Nano Pump | Increase amount a local armor repair module repairs per cycle | Increases armor repairer powergrid requirements | Armor Rigging |
Nanobot Accelerator | Decrease local armor repair module cycle time | Increases armor repairer powergrid requirements | Armor Rigging |
Remote Repair Augmentor | Reduces capacitor used by remote armor repair modules | Decreases ship's maximum velocity | Armor Rigging |
Transverse Bulkhead | Increases hull hit points by a percentage | Decreases ship's cargo capacity | Armor Rigging |
Trimark Armor Pump | Increases armor hit points by a percentage | Decreases ship's maximum velocity | Armor Rigging |
--Al hubbard (talk) 00:47, 29 November 2016 (CST)
- I was thinking of something similar yesterday, and I think it's a good idea. I would perhaps remove the skill column and mention it in the introductory text above each table, as it's the same for each group of rigs. I would also left-align the text, as it makes it easier to read.
- Additionally, I was thinking of a "note" column - but it would be empty about 80% of the time, perhaps notes as text below each table would be better? Noemie Belacqua 02:55, 29 November 2016 (CST)
- Yeah, makes sense to drop the skill column. I think the only case of a rig using a different skill than its group is the odd case of the Salvage Tackle, which can be easily explained with a note at the bottom.
- Updated table:
Name Effect Downside Anti-EM Armor Pump[1] Increase armor resistance to EM damage Decreases ship's maximum velocity Trimark Armor Pump Increase armor resistance to explosive damage Decreases ship's maximum velocity
- Do you think it would be appropriate to use multi row spanning cells, like at smartbombs, for the Downside column? --Al hubbard (talk) 13:55, 29 November 2016 (CST)