Talk:Security status: Difference between revisions

(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)

Line 1:

Hey, can we include somewhere on this page a warning about the seemingly innocuous action of cap transfer causing one to become suspect. This is confusing, and possibly even a bug.

== Cap transfer warning ==

Hey, can we include somewhere on this page a warning about the seemingly innocuous action of cap transfer causing one to become suspect. This is confusing, and possibly even a bug. -- Previous unsigned comment by [[User:Voxulus Quar Un|Voxulus Quar Un]] ([[User talk:Voxulus Quar Un|talk]]) 23:26, 16 April 2022‎ (UTC)

: Hi :) Feel free to add the information to the page :) (you can sign your comment on a Talk Page by writing four consecutive ~) [[User:Arin Mara|Arin Mara]] ([[User talk:Arin Mara|talk]]) 10:50, 19 April 2022 (UTC)

== Aggressor's security in the status change formula ==

There is this note after the security status penalty formulas: "The higher the aggressor's security standing is, the harsher the penalty as well."

But according to the formula it is obviously the other way around. When aggressor's old sec status is higher, "10 − Aggressor's old security status" is lower, so is the "(10 - ...) × Modification%" part. More over, "(1+(Target's security−Aggressor's security)/100)" and consequently the value of Modification% are also lower when aggressor's sec is higher.

Am I missing something? -- Previous unsigned comment by [[User:Aglaron|Aglaron]] ([[User talk:Aglaron|talk]]) 22:24, 14 February 2025 (UTC)

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-Hey, can we include somewhere on this page a warning about the seemingly innocuous action of cap transfer causing one to become suspect. This is confusing, and possibly even a bug.
+== Cap transfer warning ==
+Hey, can we include somewhere on this page a warning about the seemingly innocuous action of cap transfer causing one to become suspect. This is confusing, and possibly even a bug. -- Previous unsigned comment by [[User:Voxulus Quar Un|Voxulus Quar Un]] ([[User talk:Voxulus Quar Un|talk]]) 23:26, 16 April 2022‎ (UTC)
 : Hi :) Feel free to add the information to the page :) (you can sign your comment on a Talk Page by writing four consecutive ~) [[User:Arin Mara|Arin Mara]] ([[User talk:Arin Mara|talk]]) 10:50, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
+== Aggressor's security in the status change formula ==
+There is this note after the security status penalty formulas: "The higher the aggressor's security standing is, the harsher the penalty as well."
+But according to the formula it is obviously the other way around. When aggressor's old sec status is higher, "10 − Aggressor's old security status" is lower, so is the "(10 - ...) × Modification%" part. More over, "(1+(Target's security−Aggressor's security)/100)" and consequently the value of Modification% are also lower when aggressor's sec is higher.
+Am I missing something? -- Previous unsigned comment by [[User:Aglaron|Aglaron]] ([[User talk:Aglaron|talk]]) 22:24, 14 February 2025 (UTC)