Difference between revisions of "Talk:Planetary buildings"
(Created page with " * New building table: {| border="1" cellpadding="1" cellspacing="1" ! Building Type ! CPU ! Power ! Storage ! Cost (isk) ! Volume(m³) |- |Basic Command Center (Level 0) |ali...") |
m (Djavin novienta moved page Talk:Planetary Buildings to Talk:Planetary buildings) |
||
| (7 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | Walt: edited in the table below and made updates to align text and building to the incursions patch | ||
| − | * New building table: | + | * New Incursion building table: |
{| border="1" cellpadding="1" cellspacing="1" | {| border="1" cellpadding="1" cellspacing="1" | ||
| Line 16: | Line 17: | ||
|align="right"| 500 | |align="right"| 500 | ||
|align="right"| 90000 | |align="right"| 90000 | ||
| − | |align="right"| | + | |align="right"| 1000 |
|- | |- | ||
|Level 1 Command Center | |Level 1 Command Center | ||
| Line 23: | Line 24: | ||
|align="right"| 500 | |align="right"| 500 | ||
|align="right"| 670000 | |align="right"| 670000 | ||
| − | |align="right"| | + | |align="right"| |
|- | |- | ||
|Level 2 Command Center | |Level 2 Command Center | ||
| Line 30: | Line 31: | ||
|align="right"| 500 | |align="right"| 500 | ||
|align="right"| 1600000 | |align="right"| 1600000 | ||
| − | |align="right"| | + | |align="right"| |
|- | |- | ||
|Level 3 Command Center | |Level 3 Command Center | ||
| Line 37: | Line 38: | ||
|align="right"| 500 | |align="right"| 500 | ||
|align="right"| 2800000 | |align="right"| 2800000 | ||
| − | |align="right"| | + | |align="right"| |
|- | |- | ||
|Level 4 Command Center | |Level 4 Command Center | ||
| Line 44: | Line 45: | ||
|align="right"| 500 | |align="right"| 500 | ||
|align="right"| 3700000 | |align="right"| 3700000 | ||
| − | |align="right"| | + | |align="right"| |
|- | |- | ||
|Level 5 Command Center | |Level 5 Command Center | ||
| Line 51: | Line 52: | ||
|align="right"| 500 | |align="right"| 500 | ||
|align="right"| 6400000 | |align="right"| 6400000 | ||
| − | |align="right"| | + | |align="right"| |
|- | |- | ||
|Extractor Control Unit | |Extractor Control Unit | ||
| Line 63: | Line 64: | ||
|align="right"| 550 | |align="right"| 550 | ||
|align="right"| 0 | |align="right"| 0 | ||
| − | |align="right"| | + | |align="right"| 0 |
|- | |- | ||
| − | |||
|Basic Industrial Facility | |Basic Industrial Facility | ||
|align="right"| 200 | |align="right"| 200 | ||
| Line 110: | Line 110: | ||
|} | |} | ||
| + | |||
| + | Scrapyard: Estimated yield differences compared to sticking to a perfect 24-hour extraction cycle. The 100% number would be if you did a full month of daily cycles. Very rough estimates, the days listed is the length of time before the extraction program finishes: | ||
| + | |||
| + | 1 day 100% | ||
| + | 2 days 78% | ||
| + | 3 days 65% | ||
| + | 4 days 56% | ||
| + | 5 days 50% | ||
| + | 6 days 45% | ||
| + | 7 days 41% | ||
| + | 8 days 38% | ||
| + | 9 days 35% | ||
| + | 10 days 33% | ||
| + | |||
| + | So if you decide to only check your planets every two days and use about a 48h extraction time, you will get about 78% of what someone who checks daily would get. And if you want an even more hands-off system, consider going with 4-6 day extraction times, yielding 45-56% of the monthly total while only having to touch the planet a few times per month instead of daily. | ||
| + | |||
| + | I've added the merge tag to this page. Since Planetary Industry deals with the setup of a colony, it seems logical to me that everything should be in the same place to show the information and then provide an example (as the current Industry page does) [[User:Jason bouchard|Jason bouchard]] ([[User talk:Jason bouchard|talk]]) 03:32, 25 June 2014 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Removed the merge tag, since my opinion has changed after redoing the Industry page itself. I feel like it would just be overload to have it all on the same page. [[User:Jason bouchard|Jason bouchard]] ([[User talk:Jason bouchard|talk]]) 13:26, 26 June 2014 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 05:00, 11 February 2017
Walt: edited in the table below and made updates to align text and building to the incursions patch
- New Incursion building table:
| Building Type | CPU | Power | Storage | Cost (isk) | Volume(m³) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Basic Command Center (Level 0) | 1675 | 6000 | 500 | 90000 | 1000 |
| Level 1 Command Center | 7057 | 9000 | 500 | 670000 | |
| Level 2 Command Center | 12136 | 12000 | 500 | 1600000 | |
| Level 3 Command Center | 17215 | 15000 | 500 | 2800000 | |
| Level 4 Command Center | 21315 | 17000 | 500 | 3700000 | |
| Level 5 Command Center | 25415 | 19000 | 500 | 6400000 | |
| Extractor Control Unit | 400 | 2600 | 0 | 45000 | |
| Extractor Head Unit | 110 | 550 | 0 | 0 | |
| Basic Industrial Facility | 200 | 800 | 0 | 75000 | |
| Advanced Industrial Facility | 500 | 700 | 0 | 250000 | |
| High Tech Production Plant | 1100 | 400 | 0 | 525000 | |
| Storage Facility | 500 | 700 | 5000 | 250000 | |
| Launchpad | 3600 | 700 | 10000 | 900000 | |
| Link* | 10 | 5 | 0 | 0 | |
| Customs Office** | 0 | 0 | 25000 | 0 |
Scrapyard: Estimated yield differences compared to sticking to a perfect 24-hour extraction cycle. The 100% number would be if you did a full month of daily cycles. Very rough estimates, the days listed is the length of time before the extraction program finishes:
1 day 100% 2 days 78% 3 days 65% 4 days 56% 5 days 50% 6 days 45% 7 days 41% 8 days 38% 9 days 35% 10 days 33%
So if you decide to only check your planets every two days and use about a 48h extraction time, you will get about 78% of what someone who checks daily would get. And if you want an even more hands-off system, consider going with 4-6 day extraction times, yielding 45-56% of the monthly total while only having to touch the planet a few times per month instead of daily.
I've added the merge tag to this page. Since Planetary Industry deals with the setup of a colony, it seems logical to me that everything should be in the same place to show the information and then provide an example (as the current Industry page does) Jason bouchard (talk) 03:32, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
Removed the merge tag, since my opinion has changed after redoing the Industry page itself. I feel like it would just be overload to have it all on the same page. Jason bouchard (talk) 13:26, 26 June 2014 (UTC)
