Toggle menu
Toggle preferences menu
Toggle personal menu
Not logged in
Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits.

Help:Categorization: Difference between revisions

Help page
Djavin novienta (talk | contribs)
Djavin novienta (talk | contribs)
Line 57: Line 57:


The article should be left in those categories it would belong to if it had no category of its own; see [[Wikipedia:Categorization and subcategories#Topic article rule]] as well as [[Wikipedia:Categorization#Some general guidelines]].
The article should be left in those categories it would belong to if it had no category of its own; see [[Wikipedia:Categorization and subcategories#Topic article rule]] as well as [[Wikipedia:Categorization#Some general guidelines]].
==What is the state of categorization?==
When trying to categorize an article, it may be difficult to tell into which categories it should be placed.  Sometimes when trying to categorize by a field of interest, one intersects with someone else's efforts from another field.
Category policies are still being refined by experimentation, discussion, and polls.  Categorizations and systems are likely to be discussed and improved upon for a very long time.  To be part of the discussion see [[Wikipedia talk:Categorization]].
===Related topics===
To allow related articles to be grouped together, and those groupings placed into a hierarchy.  For example, both [[Gwalior]] and [[History of Gwalior]] could be in the [[:Category : Gwalior]].
There are some natural hierarchies of topics, e.g., placing [[:Category:History of India]] under [[:Category:Asia]] and [[:Category:History]].
Topic categories are unlikely to be subcategories of list categories.
Currently the software does not allow you to look at [[:Category:People]] and retrieve a list of all articles in sub-categories.


==Why might a category list not be up to date?==
==Why might a category list not be up to date?==