Toggle menu
Toggle preferences menu
Toggle personal menu
Not logged in
Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits.

UniWiki:Manual of Style/Images: Difference between revisions

From EVE University Wiki
Djavin novienta (talk | contribs)
Created page with "{{UMoS guideline}} This page gives an overview of how images are used in Wikipedia; for more information, see [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia:Image use policy|Wikipedia:Image use policy..."
 
Djavin novienta (talk | contribs)
Line 4: Line 4:
==Choosing images==
==Choosing images==
===Pertinence and encyclopedic nature===
===Pertinence and encyclopedic nature===
{{Shortcut|MOS:IMAGERELEVANCE|MOS:PERTINENCE|MOS:IRELEV}}
[[File:APEC Police Helicopter, Opera House, 2 Sept 2007.JPG|thumb|alt=Top of an unrecognizable curvy building under blue sky with a helicopter so far in the distance that it resembles a sparrow|This image adequately shows neither what a [[helicopter]] is, nor what the [[Sydney Opera House]] looks like.]]


Images must be significant and relevant in the topic's context, not primarily decorative. They are often an important [[multimedia learning|illustrative aid]] to understanding. When possible, find better images and improve captions rather than simply remove poor or inappropriate ones, especially on pages with few visuals. However, not every article needs images, and too many can be distracting.
[[File:UMoSImageExample1.JPG|thumb|alt=Top of an unrecognizable curvy building under blue sky with a helicopter so far in the distance that it resembles a sparrow|This image adequately shows neither what a [[Wikipedia:Helicopter|helicopter]] is, nor what the [[Wikipedia:Sydney Opera House|Sydney Opera House]] looks like.]]


Images should ''look like'' what they are meant to illustrate, whether or not they are provably authentic. For example, a photograph of a ''[[trompe-l'œil]]'' painting of a cupcake may be an acceptable image for [[Cupcake]], but a real cupcake that has been decorated to look like something else entirely is less appropriate. Similarly, an image of a generic-looking cell under a [[light microscope]] might be useful on multiple articles, as long as there are no ''visible'' differences between the cell in the image and the typical appearance of the cell being illustrated.
Images must be significant and relevant in the topic's context, not primarily decorative. They are often an important [[Wikipedia:multimedia learning|illustrative aid]] to understanding. When possible, find better images and improve captions rather than simply remove poor or inappropriate ones, especially on pages with few visuals. However, not every article needs images, and too many can be distracting.


Strive for variety. For example, in an article with numerous images of persons (e.g. [[Running]]), seek to depict a variety of ages, genders, and ethnicities. If an article on a general already shows its subject in uniform, two more in-uniform portraits add little interest or information; a map of an important battle, and an image of its aftermath, would be more informative. Resist the temptation to overwhelm an article with images of marginal value simply because many images are available.
Images should ''look like'' what they are meant to illustrate, whether or not they are provably authentic. For example, a photograph of a ''[[Wikipedia:Trompe-l'œil|trompe-l'œil]]'' painting of a cupcake may be an acceptable image for [[Wikipedia:Cupcake|Cupcake]], but a real cupcake that has been decorated to look like something else entirely is less appropriate. Similarly, an image of a generic-looking cell under a [[Wikipedia:Light microscope|light microscope]] might be useful on multiple articles, as long as there are no ''visible'' differences between the cell in the image and the typical appearance of the cell being illustrated.


Poor-quality images{{mdashb}}dark or blurry; showing the subject too small, hidden in clutter, or ambiguous; and so on{{mdashb}}should not be used. Think carefully about which images best illustrate the subject matter. For example:
Strive for variety. For example, in an article with numerous images of persons (e.g. [[Wikipedia:Running|Running]]), seek to depict a variety of ages, genders, and ethnicities. If an article on a general already shows its subject in uniform, two more in-uniform portraits add little interest or information; a map of an important battle, and an image of its aftermath, would be more informative. Resist the temptation to overwhelm an article with images of marginal value simply because many images are available.
* An image of a [[white-tailed eagle]] is useless if the bird appears as a speck in the sky.
 
* [[Gloria Steinem]] looks best as a portrait photograph of herself alone, not with other individuals.
Poor-quality images—dark or blurry; showing the subject too small, hidden in clutter, or ambiguous; and so on—should not be used. Think carefully about which images best illustrate the subject matter. For example:
* A suitable picture of a [[hammerhead shark]] would show its distinctive hammer-like head, to distinguish it from other species of shark.
* An image of a [[Wikipedia:White-tailed eagle|white-tailed eagle]] is useless if the bird appears as a speck in the sky.
* A map of [[Moldova]] should show its frontiers with [[Romania]] and [[Ukraine]], so people may know where the country is located in relation to its neighbors.
* [[Wikipedia:Gloria Steinem|Gloria Steinem]] looks best as a portrait photograph of herself alone, not with other individuals.
* [[Rice]] is best represented with an image of plain [[rice]], not [[fried rice]].
* A suitable picture of a [[Wikipedia:Hammerhead shark|hammerhead shark]] would show its distinctive hammer-like head, to distinguish it from other species of shark.
* Intangible concepts can be illustrated; for example, a cat with its claws out portrays [[aggression]].
* A map of [[Wikipedia:Moldova|Moldova]] should show its frontiers with [[Wikipedia:Romania|Romania]] and [[Wikipedia:Ukraine|Ukraine]], so people may know where the country is located in relation to its neighbors.
* [[Wikipedia:Rice|Rice]] is best represented with an image of plain [[Wikipedia:Rice|rice]], not [[Wikipedia:Fried rice|fried rice]].
* Intangible concepts can be illustrated; for example, a cat with its claws out portrays [[Wikipedia:Aggression|aggression]].


===Avoid entering textual information as images===
===Avoid entering textual information as images===