User:Cassiel Seraphim/Sandbox3

Vanguard setups

Below is a standard setup for your tank in our fleets. These fits are probably considered overtanked by many public communities and they are in fact overtanked for the most part. There are several reasons for it, mainly it is for safety, to give us a larger buffer and more leeway to save ships if things go wrong. We are not as concerned about pushing for efficiency above safety.

We also recommend fits that are flexible in terms of being able to do vanguards, assaults and even headquarter sites with the same ship. So some seemingly superfluous rigs are there to enable the ships to just swap out a few midslots and go from vanguards to headquarter sites.

Resist profiles

A lot of ships share a standard resist profile, so they share the same resist holes and have the same issues and weaknesses. Understanding what innate weaknesses a ship has is key to knowing how to best raise it to the desired high average resists mentioned above.

Below is a list of different resist profiles for various ship classes as well as a few specific ships with deviating profiles. The last column lists the obvious weaknesses of the class/hull, which will help you determine how to best achieve the desired resist profile. It also helps new waitlist managers as it tells them what to look for.

Ship	Base resist profile	Comments
Regular/faction battleships	0%20%40%50%	An EM hole and a weak thermal resist.
Resist bonused battleships	20%36%52%60%	Weak EM and thermal resists, but no resist holes.
Vargur	25%30%40%50%	Slightly lower EM and thermal resists, but no resist holes.
Scimitar	75%60%40%50%	No resist holes.
Basilisk	0%80%70%50%	An EM hole.
Legion	0%20%70%87,5%	An EM hole and weak thermal resists.
Loki (resist bonus)	80%60%52%60%	No resist holes.
Proteus	0%60%85%50%	An EM hole.
Tengu	0%80%70%50%	An EM hole.
Tengu (resist bonused)	20%84%76%60%	Weak EM resists.

Effective shield hit points

You can judge your tank by many means, but for Incursions the best way to measure your tank is to look at effective shield hit points (ESHP), as opposed to damage per second repaired (DPS-tank) or the generic effective hit points (EHP). This is because a lot of ships have significant armour and hull hit points, so the effective hit points value can be quite misleading on a battleship with a damage control for example, as the EHP-value skyrockets compared to a ship without a damage control fitted, but very little of it applies to the actual ESHP.

Below is a rough guide to acceptable values when it comes SEHP, but remember that you need to factor in things like resists vs buffer  as well as speed and signature. So don't casually compare a ship's effective shield hit points against this without taking that into your consideration.

Ship class	Incursion sites	Effective shield hit points
		10k ↓ 20k ↓ 30k ↓ 40k ↓ 50k ↓ 60k ↓ 70k ↓ 80k ↓
Large ship Battleships	Vanguards
	Assaults
	Headquarters
Command Ships	Vanguards
	Assaults
	Headquarters
Strategic cruisers	Vanguards
	Assaults
	Headquarters
Basilisks	Vanguards
	Assaults
	Headquarters
Scimitars	Vanguards
	Assaults
	Headquarters

    Legend:  █ Unsafe (too low)  █ Situational (depends on the pilot/fleet)  █ Safe (solid tank)  █ Overtanked (wasting potential)

Standard battleship setups

The main goal of these fits are to remain as cheap as possible while still being safe enough to run with minimal skills and rigged in a way that they can easily refit for vanguards as well as assaults and headquarter sites. Staying as cheap as possible is also useful for times of war.

Slots	Regular ships	Resist-bonused ships	Navy / Fleet Issue
	Adaptive Invulnerability Field II Adaptive Invulnerability Field II EM Ward Amplifier II	Adaptive Invulnerability Field II Adaptive Invulnerability Field II Freed up mid slot	Adaptive Invulnerability Field II Adaptive Invulnerability Field II Freed up mid slot
	Damage Control II	Freed up low slot	Damage Control II
	Core Defense Field Extender I Core Defense Field Extender I Anti-Thermal Screen Reinforcer I	Core Defense Field Extender I Anti-EM Screen Reinforcer I Anti-Thermal Screen Reinforcer I	Core Defense Field Extender I Anti-EM Screen Reinforcer II Anti-Thermal Screen Reinforcer I
Resists	69,5%70,0%72,8%77,4%	64,0%71,2%73,9%78,3%	65,2%70,0%72,8%77,4%
	72,8%74,5%76,9%80,8%	69,4%75,5%77,8%81,5%	69,2%74,5%76,9%80,8%
	43,1%44,0%40,0%50,0%	41,2%53,0%49,6%58,0%	35,0%44,0%40,0%50,0%

Advanced battleship setups

There are several ways to improve your fits, especially with some of the more efficient but costly deadspace modules and tech two rigs. Below are just examples of two common ways to upgrade your tank to free up more slots for additional offensive modules to increase your applied damage.

Slots	Weighted resists	Balanced resists	Offense focused
	Pithum C-Type Adaptive Invuln ... Adaptive Invulnerability Field II Freed up mid slot	Pithum C-Type Adaptive Invuln ... EM Ward Amplifier II Freed up mid slot	Pithum A-Type Adaptive Invuln ... Freed up mid slot Freed up mid slot
	Freed up low slot	Damage Control II	Damage Control II
	Core Defense Field Extender II Anti-EM Screen Reinforcer II Freed up rig slot	Core Defense Field Extender II Anti-Thermal Screen Reinforcer II Freed up rig slot	Anti-EM Screen Reinforcer I Large Burst Aerator II Burst Aerator II Unusable rig slot
Resists	65,8%64,9%73,7%78,1%	69,9%71,1%68,8%74,0%	-%-%-%-%
	71,8%71,8%78,9%82,4%	73,4%75,0%73,1%77,6%	-%-%-%-%
	35,0%20,0%40,0%50,0%	46,9%48,0%40,0%50,0%	-%-%-%-%

Weighted resists

This variant is mostly suited for vanguard and assault sites where the threat of neuting is small and the incoming damage is slightly skewed towards more torpedoes, thus kinetic and explosive resists are slightly more important. The anti-EM rig ensures that in the case of being completely neuted out, you still have at least some EM-resists even if both invulnerability fields gets shut down. Buffing the tank for this kind of setup usually involves using a second deadspace hardener.

Balanced resists

For sites where heavy neuting is common, like in headquarter and mothership sites, a more balanced setup might be favoured. The damage control module also adds some additional buffer to your armour and structure in case the higher alpha punches through your shields before reps land. The combination of the anti-thermal rig and EM amplifier allows for a high, balanced, resist profile even when completely neuted out. Buffing the tank is as simple as adding a second invulnerability field.

Offense focused

...

Strategic cruiser setups

The resist profiles of strategic cruisers vary quite a lot compared to other ships. As such there are many ways to fit them and their low signature and high agility can allow for many compromises. But in general they should plug certain holes and here's a few examples of one way of attaining the desired resist profiles for these ships.

Slots	Legion	Loki
	Pithum C-Type Adaptive Invulnerability Field Adaptive Invulnerability Field II Freed up mid slot	Pithum C-Type Adaptive Invulnerability Field EM Ward Amplifier II Freed up mid slot
	Freed up low slot	Damage Control II
	Core Defense Field Extender II Anti-EM Screen Reinforcer II Freed up rig slot	Core Defense Field Extender II Anti-Thermal Screen Reinforcer II Freed up rig slot
	Legion Defensive - Augmented Plating	Legion Defensive - X
Resists	-%-%-%-%	-%-%-%-%
	-%-%-%-%	-%-%-%-%
	-%-%-%-%	-%-%-%-%