UniWiki:Manual of Style/Layout: Difference between revisions

Line 69:

==="See also" section===

~~{{shortcut|WP:ALSO|MOS~~:~~SEEALSO}}~~

:''For "other uses" templates, see [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia:Hatnote|Wikipedia:Hatnote]]''

~~{{for|~~"other uses" templates ~~(such as this one)~~|Wikipedia:Hatnote}}

{{see also|UniWiki:Manual of Style/Embedded lists#See also lists}}

{{see also|~~Wikipedia~~:Manual of Style/Embedded lists#See also lists}}

'''Contents:''' A bulleted list, preferably alphabetized, of [[~~Wikipedia~~:Manual of Style/Linking|internal links]] to related ~~Wikipedia~~ articles~~. Consider using {{tl|Columns-list}} or {{tl|Div col}} if the list is lengthy~~. The links in the "See also" section might be only indirectly related to the topic of the article because one purpose of "See also" links is to enable readers to explore tangentially related topics.

'''Contents:''' A bulleted list, preferably alphabetized, of [[UniWiki:Manual of Style/Linking|internal links]] to related UniWiki articles. The links in the "See also" section might be only indirectly related to the topic of the article because one purpose of "See also" links is to enable readers to explore tangentially related topics.

Editors should provide a brief annotation when a link's relevance is not immediately apparent, when the meaning of the term may not be generally known, or when the term is ambiguous. For example:

:* [[Everyman|Related person]] – made a similar achievement on April 4, 2005

:* [[Wikipedia:Everyman|Related person]] – made a similar achievement on April 4, 2005

:* [[Ischemia]] – restriction in blood supply

:* [[Wikipedia:Ischemia|Ischemia]] – restriction in blood supply

Whether a link belongs in the "See also" section is ultimately a matter of editorial judgment and ~~[[WP:UCS|~~common sense]]. The links in the "See also" section should be relevant, should reflect the links that would be present in a comprehensive article on the topic, and should be limited to a reasonable number. It is also not mandatory, as many high-quality and comprehensive articles do not have a "See also" ~~section, although some featured articles like [[1740 Batavia massacre]] and [[Mary, Queen of Scots]] include this~~ section.

Whether a link belongs in the "See also" section is ultimately a matter of editorial judgment and common sense. The links in the "See also" section should be relevant, should reflect the links that would be present in a comprehensive article on the topic, and should be limited to a reasonable number. It is also not mandatory, as many high-quality and comprehensive articles do not have a "See also" section.

~~{{shortcut|WP:NOTSEEALSO|MOS:NOTSEEALSO}}~~

The "See also" section should '''not''' link to [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia:Red link|pages that do not exist (red links)]] nor to [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia:Disambiguation|disambiguation pages]] (unless used for [[UniWiki:Manual of Style/Disambiguation pages#"See also" section|further disambiguation]] in a disambiguation page). As a general rule, the "See also" section should '''not''' repeat links that appear in the article's body or its [[Wikipedia:WP:NAVBOX|navigation boxes]].

~~{{anchor|NOTSEEALSO}}~~The "See also" section should '''not''' link to [[Wikipedia:Red link|pages that do not exist (red links)]] nor to [[Wikipedia:Disambiguation|disambiguation pages]] (unless used for [[WP:Manual of Style/Disambiguation pages#"See also" section|further disambiguation]] in a disambiguation page). As a general rule, the "See also" section should '''not''' repeat links that appear in the article's body or its [[WP:NAVBOX|navigation boxes]].

~~'''Other internal links:''' {{tl|Portal}} and {{tl|Wikipedia books}} links are usually placed in this section~~.

'''Title:''' The most common title for this section is "See also".

@@ Line 69: / Line 69: @@
 ==="See also" section===
-{{shortcut|WP:ALSO|MOS:SEEALSO}}
+:''For "other uses" templates, see [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia:Hatnote|Wikipedia:Hatnote]]''
-{{for|"other uses" templates (such as this one)|Wikipedia:Hatnote}}
+{{see also|UniWiki:Manual of Style/Embedded lists#See also lists}}
-{{see also|Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Embedded lists#See also lists}}
-'''Contents:'''  A bulleted list, preferably alphabetized, of [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Linking|internal links]] to related Wikipedia articles. Consider using {{tl|Columns-list}} or {{tl|Div col}} if the list is lengthy. The links in the "See also" section might be only indirectly related to the topic of the article because one purpose of "See also" links is to enable readers to explore tangentially related topics.
+'''Contents:'''  A bulleted list, preferably alphabetized, of [[UniWiki:Manual of Style/Linking|internal links]] to related UniWiki articles. The links in the "See also" section might be only indirectly related to the topic of the article because one purpose of "See also" links is to enable readers to explore tangentially related topics.
 Editors should provide a brief annotation when a link's relevance is not immediately apparent, when the meaning of the term may not be generally known, or when the term is ambiguous.  For example:
-:* [[Everyman|Related person]]&nbsp;– made a similar achievement on April 4, 2005
+:* [[Wikipedia:Everyman|Related person]]&nbsp;– made a similar achievement on April 4, 2005
-:* [[Ischemia]]&nbsp;– restriction in blood supply
+:* [[Wikipedia:Ischemia|Ischemia]]&nbsp;– restriction in blood supply
-Whether a link belongs in the "See also" section is ultimately a matter of editorial judgment and [[WP:UCS|common sense]].   The links in the "See also" section should be relevant, should reflect the links that would be present in a comprehensive article on the topic, and should be limited to a reasonable number.  It is also not mandatory, as many high-quality and comprehensive articles do not have a "See also" section, although some featured articles like [[1740 Batavia massacre]] and [[Mary, Queen of Scots]] include this section.
+Whether a link belongs in the "See also" section is ultimately a matter of editorial judgment and common sense. The links in the "See also" section should be relevant, should reflect the links that would be present in a comprehensive article on the topic, and should be limited to a reasonable number. It is also not mandatory, as many high-quality and comprehensive articles do not have a "See also" section.
-{{shortcut|WP:NOTSEEALSO|MOS:NOTSEEALSO}}
+The "See also" section should '''not''' link to [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia:Red link|pages that do not exist (red links)]] nor to [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia:Disambiguation|disambiguation pages]] (unless used for [[UniWiki:Manual of Style/Disambiguation pages#"See also" section|further disambiguation]] in a disambiguation page).  As a general rule, the "See also" section should '''not''' repeat links that appear in the article's body or its [[Wikipedia:WP:NAVBOX|navigation boxes]].
-{{anchor|NOTSEEALSO}}The "See also" section should '''not''' link to [[Wikipedia:Red link|pages that do not exist (red links)]] nor to [[Wikipedia:Disambiguation|disambiguation pages]] (unless used for [[WP:Manual of Style/Disambiguation pages#"See also" section|further disambiguation]] in a disambiguation page).  As a general rule, the "See also" section should '''not''' repeat links that appear in the article's body or its [[WP:NAVBOX|navigation boxes]].
-'''Other internal links:''' {{tl|Portal}} and {{tl|Wikipedia books}} links are usually placed in this section.
 '''Title:''' The most common title for this section is "See also".