Toggle menu
Toggle preferences menu
Toggle personal menu
Not logged in
Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits.

Overheating: Difference between revisions

From EVE University Wiki
Module Heat Damage Odds: AND SUITONIA DID A VIDEO ON THIS AND LINKED THIS PAGE SO SUDDENLY I NEED TO CORRECT THINGS. RAPIDLY. WHERE'S MY LATEX PARSER.
Line 177: Line 177:
* The '''Rack Heat''' of the rack being overheated. As Rack Heat rises, the odds of heat damage instances occurring increases, and the odds of larger numbers of modules being damaged by one proc increases. In the past, this was erroneously believed to be a simple 1-4 multiplier on the number of modules that could be damaged at once, but in reality it acts as a percentage chance for a given module to receive heat damage, after the results of the other factors. (It is theoretically possible for every single module in a rack to be damaged by a single overheat cycle, however in practice this is highly unlikely.)
* The '''Rack Heat''' of the rack being overheated. As Rack Heat rises, the odds of heat damage instances occurring increases, and the odds of larger numbers of modules being damaged by one proc increases. In the past, this was erroneously believed to be a simple 1-4 multiplier on the number of modules that could be damaged at once, but in reality it acts as a percentage chance for a given module to receive heat damage, after the results of the other factors. (It is theoretically possible for every single module in a rack to be damaged by a single overheat cycle, however in practice this is highly unlikely.)
* The '''placement of modules''' in the rack. Modules that are being overheated have the highest chance to deal heat damage instances to themselves and to immediately adjacent modules. Every additional module slot of distance away from an overheating module reduces the chances of that other module being damaged, to the point that modules on opposite ends of a rack have the lowest chances to damage each other. If a module is on the far end of a rack, or has only empty slots to one side of it, it may attempt to deal heat damage to the nonexistant modules off the end of the rack, which will result in the module itself erroneously flashing to indicate heat damage being dealt, and no heat damage actually being dealt in that direction. The result of this is that in a rack where only a small number of modules will be overheated, the best slots to place those modules is either on one far end (for one overheating module), opposite far ends (for two), or as evenly spaced across the rack as possible (for more); and the worst slots to place overheating modules in is either the center of the rack (causing it to damage all other modules in the rack) or adjacent to another to-be-overheated module (as they will damage and burn each other out). Note that these module placements apply to the fitting screen, not the hotbar; the placement of module buttons on the hotbar does not matter.
* The '''placement of modules''' in the rack. Modules that are being overheated have the highest chance to deal heat damage instances to themselves and to immediately adjacent modules. Every additional module slot of distance away from an overheating module reduces the chances of that other module being damaged, to the point that modules on opposite ends of a rack have the lowest chances to damage each other. If a module is on the far end of a rack, or has only empty slots to one side of it, it may attempt to deal heat damage to the nonexistant modules off the end of the rack, which will result in the module itself erroneously flashing to indicate heat damage being dealt, and no heat damage actually being dealt in that direction. The result of this is that in a rack where only a small number of modules will be overheated, the best slots to place those modules is either on one far end (for one overheating module), opposite far ends (for two), or as evenly spaced across the rack as possible (for more); and the worst slots to place overheating modules in is either the center of the rack (causing it to damage all other modules in the rack) or adjacent to another to-be-overheated module (as they will damage and burn each other out). Note that these module placements apply to the fitting screen, not the hotbar; the placement of module buttons on the hotbar does not matter.
* The number of '''Online''', versus '''Offline''' or '''Empty''', slots in the rack. Based on [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7V3ueIUBr3U research performed in 2017] by Minchurra, the odds for a module to damage not just other modules but also ''itself'' is related to whether or not it is adjacent to other online modules, versus being adjacent to offline modules or empty slots. As per his research, a module which has multiple adjacent Online modules is significantly more likely to damage itself while being overheated, than a module with multiple adjacent Offline modules (or empty slots).
* The number of '''Online''', versus '''Offline''' or '''Empty''', slots in the ship. The odds for any module to sustain overheat damage is based on the total number of Online modules on the ship, divided by the total number of high, mid, low, ''and rig'' slots on the ship. (Rigs do not count as online modules for this calculation.)  
* The '''ship''', and the number of '''slots''' in the rack. Every ship hull has three hidden attributes (named <code>heatAttenuationHi</code>, <code>heatAttenuationLow</code>, and <code>heatAttenuationMid</code>). In general, the values of these attributes correspond to the number of slots in the rack, with the numbers being higher for racks with more slots. Higher values of these attributes represent greater chances for heat damage to ''not'' be dealt in a cycle, either to the source module or an adjacent module. This reduction is usually cancelled out by the rack having more modules in it for heat to bounce between, but it also means that if a ship has only one overheated module in a long but entirely empty rack, that one module will have an extremely long lifespan.
* The '''ship''', and the hidden '''heatAttenuation''' value for the rack. Every ship hull has three hidden attributes (named <code>heatAttenuationHi</code>, <code>heatAttenuationLow</code>, and <code>heatAttenuationMid</code>). In general, the values of these attributes correspond to the number of slots in the rack, with the numbers being higher for racks with more slots. Higher values of these attributes represent greater chances for heat damage to spread across adjacent modules down the rack. The value of the attribute is a decimal chance for the heat to spread to each further module, meaning that the chance for a given module to receive heat damage is equal to the <code>heatAttenuation</code> factor, raised to the power of the distance (in slots) between the overheated module and the module being damaged.


=== Heat Sinking ===
=== Heat Sinking ===