m Add response. |
|||
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
-- [[User:Piscine Martin Yu|Piscine Martin Yu]] ([[User talk:Piscine Martin Yu|talk]]) 17:06, 15 July 2024 (UTC) | -- [[User:Piscine Martin Yu|Piscine Martin Yu]] ([[User talk:Piscine Martin Yu|talk]]) 17:06, 15 July 2024 (UTC) | ||
: OK, let me see if I can address this with some sense. For starters let me say I have no experience with FW so I need to be a bit general. | |||
: Merging '''Corruption and Suppression''' and '''Ambition Modifier''' into the primary article is an option but it depends as you indicated partly on hoe much there is to say about them, partly by how the details would clutter up the primary article and partly by the subjects "independency". There are no hard and fast rules about when to add to the primary article and when to keep them separate. | |||
: So let me say what, at the current state, I would probably do. For '''Corruption and Suppression''' I would keep that separate as I see that as an amount of details which would clutter the primary article making it harder to read. | |||
: For '''Ambition Modifier''' I am unsure. If I remember correctly what is in there now is more or less directly copied from the patch notes. And there is at least one point that needs clarification. This part "The Ambition Modifier can go as high as +13, requiring a side to fully corrupt or suppress 20 solarsystems for victory..." which side needs 20 the one with the modifier at 13 or the other? | |||
: '''Forward Operating Base''' I would definitely not merge into the primary article. Yes there is not much there noe but I have the feeling that there could be quit a bit more information. | |||
: But keep in mind merging or not can always been reversed if "needed". | |||
: "I should find the patch" if it is that close to the Havoc expansion it could probably be found somewhere in here https://www.eveonline.com/news/view/patch-notes-version-21-06 | |||
: I just saw that Mednik answered your signature question on Discord but I repeat that info here anyway the most common way is to use <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>(4x). But using <nowiki>~~~</nowiki>(3x) gives a signature without the timestamp. | |||
: Based on your recent edits I have the impression that I confused you a bit. You changed the wiki mark-up for the headings (==) into html mark-up (<nowiki><h2></nowiki>) that is not what I meant. Remember you are writing for a wiki, not for a website, (Yes, I know the result is a website) so you should, wherever possible use the wiki mark-up and avoid direct html as much as possible. That said the wiki mark-up for <nowiki><hr></nowiki> is <nowiki>----</nowiki>. | |||
: As I said on Discord for '''Corruption and Suppression''' I would use {{tl|Main}} but for '''Ambition Modifier''' I would keep {{Tl|See also}} or even make the first mention of Ambition Modifier into a link. | |||
: One more thing for now for the first mention of Forward Operating Base the full name should be used possible followed by (FOB) after that FOB can be used in the rest of the article. Keep in mind that the wiki is not only for the experienced but also for uninitiated who have no idea what a FOB is. -- [[User:Evon R'al|Evon R'all]] ([[User talk:Evon R'al|talk]]) 17:45, 15 July 2024 (UTC) | |||
LOL You edited while I was typing My response. Did not modify my response so there might now be some disconnect between your and my post. | |||