Talk:Incursion sites

Double Navbox

Double-navbox or not ... initially I left it off, simply because it wasn't needed and the fact it just looks and behaves weird when you got two navboxes competing for visibility. From this page there are numerous links to all the individual sites, so that reference is still there, pretty clear as it's under each of the vanguard, assault and headquarter sections. When you move on to actual site pages, your "hub", the navbox, changes into links to all the sites, with the top two links taking you back to the general "incursion" area and the original incursion navbox.

I'm not sure it benefits the reader to get two for this particular page. Cassiel seraphim (talk) 09:33, 24 August 2015 (CDT)

I'm inclined to agree with that reasoning, so if you think it works better with only one then feel free to take it off. It's stylistically good to have consistency with the other pages. My initial reasoning for the change was that it worked quite nicely as a short summary of all the different sites, which is a bit redundant as you say. I think the top could be preserved if the navbox was moved to the bottom of the page, but as it is vertical it might still look odd there. Telinchei (talk) 00:55, 25 August 2015 (CDT)