Archive:Solitude StarCraft Enterprise: Difference between revisions

Line 65:

== Known issues with the first run ==

Some of the issues found in the first project included:

#Lack of ISK incentive for the haulers and the manufacturers involved in the venture.

#Lack of ISK incentive for the haulers and the manufacturers involved in the venture

#Share system that needed some balancing to fairly distribute the profit.

#Share system that needed some balancing to fairly distribute the profit

#The Archon market dropping over the course of the project, and the inflated sale price to the LSC customer brought up issues with [http://forum.eveuniversity.org/viewtopic.php?f=218&t=75294 calculating if this project actually made a profit].

#The Archon market dropping over the course of the project, and the inflated sale price to the LSC customer brought up issues with [http://forum.eveuniversity.org/viewtopic.php?f=218&t=75294 calculating if this project actually made a profit]

#The difficult logistics situation in tracking donations and managing shares

#All of the ISK generated was not distributed to the contributors until the final sale was complete.

#All of the ISK generated was not distributed to the contributors until the final sale was complete

#Lack of project security in its current state, making it easy to have flown off with over 300 million in materials.

#Lack of project security in its current state, making it easy to have flown off with over 300 million in materials

Aren Tivianne and Mman Themen then [http://forum.eveuniversity.org/viewtopic.php?f=218&t=73748 put these issues to the forums], and out of the discussions and debates, the project was [http://forum.eveuniversity.org/viewtopic.php?f=218&t=75537 replanned] and [http://forum.eveuniversity.org/viewtopic.php?f=218&t=75791 reborn] as The StarCraft Enterprise.

@@ Line 65: / Line 65: @@
 == Known issues with the first run ==
 Some of the issues found in the first project included:
-#Lack of ISK incentive for the haulers and the manufacturers involved in the venture.
+#Lack of ISK incentive for the haulers and the manufacturers involved in the venture
-#Share system that needed some balancing to fairly distribute the profit.
+#Share system that needed some balancing to fairly distribute the profit
-#The Archon market dropping over the course of the project, and the inflated sale price to the LSC customer brought up issues with [http://forum.eveuniversity.org/viewtopic.php?f=218&t=75294 calculating if this project actually made a profit].
+#The Archon market dropping over the course of the project, and the inflated sale price to the LSC customer brought up issues with [http://forum.eveuniversity.org/viewtopic.php?f=218&t=75294 calculating if this project actually made a profit]
 #The difficult logistics situation in tracking donations and managing shares
-#All of the ISK generated was not distributed to the contributors until the final sale was complete.
+#All of the ISK generated was not distributed to the contributors until the final sale was complete
-#Lack of project security in its current state, making it easy to have flown off with over 300 million in materials.
+#Lack of project security in its current state, making it easy to have flown off with over 300 million in materials
 Aren Tivianne and Mman Themen then [http://forum.eveuniversity.org/viewtopic.php?f=218&t=73748 put these issues to the forums], and out of the discussions and debates, the project was [http://forum.eveuniversity.org/viewtopic.php?f=218&t=75537 replanned] and [http://forum.eveuniversity.org/viewtopic.php?f=218&t=75791 reborn] as The StarCraft Enterprise.